jye4ever
Broke and happy
Don't know if posted already
Oh man, that is not flattering.
Those legs, those arms, oh dear oh dear.
Thoooooose legs.......
At least her head looks good.
Don't know if posted already
Nah, Morrison's a bro, I don't think I've ever heard him say anything douchbaggy.
He's got plenty cool quotes, all of his documentaries are pretty inspirational, it's when he goes out of his way to be a ****** that he makes me roll my eyes
Are those the cans you can scan for the prequel comics?
Oh he's crazy, just not a dbagNot a ********* per se, but his "aliens abducted me" stories aren't exactly the thoughts of the "average man".
He's a special snowflake alright.Yeah, when he tries too hard, he tends to come off as a cranky old man. Which, he actually is, but eh, geniuses tend to be a bit more... "unique"...
It's a can, it warps everything, look at the sword and the forearms.Oh man, that is not flattering.
Those legs, those arms, oh dear oh dear.
Thoooooose legs.......
At least her head looks good.
Oh he's crazy, just not a dbag
I like his understanding of metaphysical stuff better than Moore's.
He's a special snowflake alright.
That's not the can doing that lol.
Moore tries to connect "magic" with art, which comes across as focrced. Meanwhile, Grant is more of a "ancient architects of lives past created that which we call the present, and we are but specs in their grand plans" type of guy. Moore is for when you're feeling down and want something horrific. Morisson is a bit more uplifting IMO.
It depends on the context. Moore's is a bit more on the philosophical side, whereas Morrison's interpretaion leans more on scientific theories of what a fifth dimensions would look like, albeit with his own "twist". Then again, he's done more drugs than you can count, so there's that. Bottom line is, they're both nuts, but their work is gold.I actually like his rationalization of magic, as manipulating words and images to provoke a change, Morrison's "Magick" is more crude.
Yeah but Morrison's magick is pretty weird.It depends on the context. Moore's is a bit more on the philosophical side, whereas Morrison's interpretaion leans more on scientific theories of what a fifth dimensions would look like, albeit with his own "twist". Then again, he's done more drugs than you can count, so there's that. Bottom line is, they're both nuts, but their work is gold.
Damn, beat me to it.[emoji1]What's going on here? We talking about Lois Lane and Wonder Woman's cans?
What's going on here? We talking about Lois Lane and Wonder Woman's cans?
Who the hell wants a can with Lois Lane on it?
Meanwhile, Grant is more of a "ancient architects of lives past created that which we call the present, and we are but specs in their grand plans" type of guy. Moore is for when you're feeling down and want something horrific. Morisson is a bit more uplifting IMO.
Yeah but Morrison's magick is pretty weird.
Do you know how he "activates" a sigil?
That's a great way to describe him. Morrison is my favorite comic book writer. He wrote my favorite Batman, Superman, Justice League, and X-Men. I really want to check out his Animal Man and Doom Patrol! Morrison might be out there, but he's way smarter than me! Even if I don't understand something, I appreciate the amount of depth he has in his writing. I just re-read Batman RIP for the first time in 5 years, and it's now my favorite Batman story. I'm glad to see something different with these movies because I don't know how anything will get to that level of enjoyment that I got from his Batman run.
Enter your email address to join: