I would think that's because he doesn't have the following they're currently catering too, otherwise Thor would've never stopped being Thor because of that whisper on the moon
Honestly, they're catering to everyone. You've got the female books, the dark books, the whimsical books, the super-hero books. There's something for every taste. But yeah, that was ridiculous.
Yeah, but even Superman books stopped being whimsical long ago, they're optimistic sure, but they're also very serious and very philosophical, the writing is very light on quips, which is also true for the majority of DC since like the 90's), which is opposed to Marvel, especially lately.
Eh, most Marvel books don't really have quips. Daredevil is back to its noir roots. Moon Knight is inside a mental asylum. Nighthawk will be taking on racism in America. Punisher will be going after the Cartel. Hawkeye deals with child neglect. Old Man Logan is dealing with the classic "if you could go back in time and kill Hitler, would you do it" only this time, this Logan is deranged and is going after the wrong people. But he's so haunted by it, that he doesn't know what he's doing. If you look for such books, you'll find them. If you're looking for philosophical debates, nothing beats Ultimates as far as the Big 2 go. IMO always.
Sure, there are still the Iron Mans and the Spider-Mans, but DC has Harley Quinn, which puts Hellcat and Squirell Girl to shame with its quirkiness. But still, quirky and lighthearted doesn't mean bad. I know that the Mario games ain't got **** on Mass Effect, but I still love playing them. Variety is the spice of life...
I haven't caught up to issues #50, but before that, I have to tell you, most of the DC stuff I've read from DC is much better than most of the stuff I've read since Marvel now. Granted I've read each in like a 70:30 ratio in favor of DC.
Eh, depends on what you read. Duggan's Deadpool was brilliant but his Hulk was forgettable. Waid's Daredevil was near-perfect, but his Hulk rather bland. Snyder's Batman was great, but his Eternal minis overblown and boring. Gillien's Iron Man was rather awful, but his Darth Vader is great. Honestly, it's all down to preference.
Huh? I keep hearing Doc Strange new run is pretty whimsical.
A bit quirky yes, and nothing like the original, but the theme is rather mature. It deals with power and what people ar ready to sacrifice for it. On a personal and sometimes not-so-personal level. It's not my favourite, but it's good enough.
When I say dark and serious, I don't mean cursing or violence, I mean their philosophical core. But you are right, it's all down to preference, DC resonates more with ancient mythology, which is why I like DC better and that's why I love Thor, for instance, from Marvel.
I do like the occasional street level like Moon Knight, Marvel has a plethora of those to choose from.
From my experience, Marvel has a more hands on approach on philosophy. It's more "Requiem for a Dream", whereas DC's more like "The Tree of Life" (Priest's Black Panther run is one of the best and smartest comic book runs ever). Both are great, but it depends on the person which one he/she consideres "best". There are countless schools of philosophy after all. Nobody is right and nobody is wrong. There's no universally correct way to enjoy, judge or approach things. You just pick a road and follow it. In my personal, and maybe biased opinion, I find Marvel more akin to my interests. But that doesn't make it an Omniversal truth. It's an opinion, just like everyone else's...