VintijDroidGutzz
Super Freak
Re: Batman vs. Superman (2016)
The Cat Man one works well.
The Cat Man one works well.
Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice (March 24th, 2016)
- Thread starter Uncanny Web-Slinger
- Start date
Help Support Collector Freaks Forum:
Re: Batman vs. Superman (2016)
I just want to see a Batman movie with an aerial vehicle that actually doesn't get destroyed before the movie is over. Maybe 4th time will be the charm.
I just want to see a Batman movie with an aerial vehicle that actually doesn't get destroyed before the movie is over. Maybe 4th time will be the charm.
beeshaw
Super Freak
Re: Batman vs. Superman (2016)
For the most part yes, but he should have dropped the hand held stuff once the action started. Especially with the bulk of it being CGI anyway, and with the speed they are fighting. A few slower shots to show some of the contact made would have gone a long way. There's one shot in particular where there's a close up of an eye as a punch is coming (I think...so fast) that would have been nice to have actually SEEN instead of just blurs.
The opening scene of Watchmen with Ozymandias beating the hell out of the Comedian (spoiler alert) was amazing. I'd love some of the fight scenes in BvsS to follow along the same lines.
For the most part yes, but he should have dropped the hand held stuff once the action started. Especially with the bulk of it being CGI anyway, and with the speed they are fighting. A few slower shots to show some of the contact made would have gone a long way. There's one shot in particular where there's a close up of an eye as a punch is coming (I think...so fast) that would have been nice to have actually SEEN instead of just blurs.
The opening scene of Watchmen with Ozymandias beating the hell out of the Comedian (spoiler alert) was amazing. I'd love some of the fight scenes in BvsS to follow along the same lines.
beeshaw
Super Freak
Re: Batman vs. Superman (2016)
You know if there's a Batwing Supes will just punch that son of a ***** out of the sky. lol
You know if there's a Batwing Supes will just punch that son of a ***** out of the sky. lol
Re: Batman vs. Superman (2016)
Yea, all this batman stuff means nothing unless kryptonite makes an appearance. I wonder how that will be handled.
Yea, all this batman stuff means nothing unless kryptonite makes an appearance. I wonder how that will be handled.
Silrian
Super Freak
Re: Batman vs. Superman (2016)
Still wonder how the hell Batman's gonna even damage Superman at all without the typical Kryptonite.
Has to be something kryptonian to weaken him right?
Still wonder how the hell Batman's gonna even damage Superman at all without the typical Kryptonite.
Has to be something kryptonian to weaken him right?
GasparZizou
Super Freak
Re: Batman vs. Superman (2016)
I bet they will introduce kryptonite, it's too important and it's the only attainable way Lex Luthor or Batman can get toe to toe against Supes, besides, Metallo will be in this movie, Metallo's heart is made of pure kryptonite, he runs on kryptonite, that's his thing, without it, he's just a lame *** shape shifting robot, also kryptonite is the reason Lex went bald.
I remember in an interview they asked Snyder why kryptonite didn't exist in this universe, but he corrected the guy saying he only said kryptonite would be absent in MoS, not in the entirety of the cinematic universe.
I bet they will introduce kryptonite, it's too important and it's the only attainable way Lex Luthor or Batman can get toe to toe against Supes, besides, Metallo will be in this movie, Metallo's heart is made of pure kryptonite, he runs on kryptonite, that's his thing, without it, he's just a lame *** shape shifting robot, also kryptonite is the reason Lex went bald.
I remember in an interview they asked Snyder why kryptonite didn't exist in this universe, but he corrected the guy saying he only said kryptonite would be absent in MoS, not in the entirety of the cinematic universe.
Re: Batman vs. Superman (2016)
Not necessarily
His Ghost dad can take away all of his super human powers and he would become just a regular guy so that he can have sex with Louis Lane.
And THEN Batman can beat him to a bloody pulp
Even some old drunk trucker can beat the lights out of him after that
Not necessarily
His Ghost dad can take away all of his super human powers and he would become just a regular guy so that he can have sex with Louis Lane.
And THEN Batman can beat him to a bloody pulp
Even some old drunk trucker can beat the lights out of him after that
GasparZizou
Super Freak
Re: Batman vs. Superman (2016)
^^^
^^^
pturtle
Super Freak
- Joined
- Jun 21, 2013
- Messages
- 10,289
- Reaction score
- 36
Re: Batman vs. Superman (2016)
It's confirmed Metallo is in the movie? How the hell did I miss that.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
It's confirmed Metallo is in the movie? How the hell did I miss that.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
GasparZizou
Super Freak
Re: Batman vs. Superman (2016)
Oh right, it isn't, it was part of the initial rumors, but for some reason I ran with it ever since, so I guess no, it's not confirmed.
But even without Metallo, kryptonite is just as important.
Oh right, it isn't, it was part of the initial rumors, but for some reason I ran with it ever since, so I guess no, it's not confirmed. But even without Metallo, kryptonite is just as important.
Kinetic
Super Freak
- Joined
- Jun 8, 2013
- Messages
- 316
- Reaction score
- 4
Re: Batman vs. Superman (2016)
Last time I heard about it was a rumor from another site. I doubt it's been confirmed by a reliable source.
Last time I heard about it was a rumor from another site. I doubt it's been confirmed by a reliable source.
VintijDroidGutzz
Super Freak
pturtle
Super Freak
- Joined
- Jun 21, 2013
- Messages
- 10,289
- Reaction score
- 36
Batman vs. Superman (2016)
Oh okay, usually I'm on top of my news haha.
I remember that interview with Snyder hinting at Kryptonite existing in this universe, undoubtably it will be in BvsS in some form. I know when MOS was releasing, Supergirl was being hinted at as well, I wonder if she'll play apart in the movie as well.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Oh okay, usually I'm on top of my news haha.
I remember that interview with Snyder hinting at Kryptonite existing in this universe, undoubtably it will be in BvsS in some form. I know when MOS was releasing, Supergirl was being hinted at as well, I wonder if she'll play apart in the movie as well.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
**16k**
Super Freak
Re: Batman vs. Superman (2016)
Yes, I agree. There is definitely kryptonite. When you see the Black Zero reappears, debris from Krypton are all around it!
Yes, I agree. There is definitely kryptonite. When you see the Black Zero reappears, debris from Krypton are all around it!
hunnipot85
Super Freak
- Joined
- Jun 7, 2008
- Messages
- 6,399
- Reaction score
- 27
Re: Batman vs. Superman (2016)
Anyone post the set photo of Gal Gadot?
https://www.comicbookmovie.com/fansites/devlin712/news/?a=100212
Anyone post the set photo of Gal Gadot?
https://www.comicbookmovie.com/fansites/devlin712/news/?a=100212
Silrian
Super Freak
Re: Batman vs. Superman (2016)
yuck......
Anyone post the set photo of Gal Gadot?
https://www.comicbookmovie.com/fansites/devlin712/news/?a=100212
yuck......
Silrian
Super Freak
Re: Batman vs. Superman (2016)
Eisenberg recently spoke shortly about Lex, having been convinced solely by the script and says he will not look at past performances whatsoever. He's going to approach it as a character like he would any other and claims it's also a character that's very well written and doesn't look like it's from a blockbuster film.
I know the haters are abound even more so for him than Affleck maybe, but I'm very intrigued by his casting, in fact... I'm close to being curious most about it.
Eisenberg definitely did not have to do this gig, at all. And after his Fincher gig you can bet your *** he sees some of the best scripts in town. If he's so convinced by it that boosts my excitement for it highly. I like him as an actor, and I'm very intrigued the choice fell to him.
After seeing what Shannon did with Zod, which I found fantastic, I feel there's no reason for me to have any doubts about DC continuing it's fantastic streak in villain-casting.
Eisenberg recently spoke shortly about Lex, having been convinced solely by the script and says he will not look at past performances whatsoever. He's going to approach it as a character like he would any other and claims it's also a character that's very well written and doesn't look like it's from a blockbuster film.
I know the haters are abound even more so for him than Affleck maybe, but I'm very intrigued by his casting, in fact... I'm close to being curious most about it.
Eisenberg definitely did not have to do this gig, at all. And after his Fincher gig you can bet your *** he sees some of the best scripts in town. If he's so convinced by it that boosts my excitement for it highly. I like him as an actor, and I'm very intrigued the choice fell to him.
After seeing what Shannon did with Zod, which I found fantastic, I feel there's no reason for me to have any doubts about DC continuing it's fantastic streak in villain-casting.
Similar threads
