thenammagazine
Super Freak
Already addressed your faulty logic.
Your responses are on par with "" and have zero relevance and your comparison of Nolan's Batman films to Heat is still only laughable at best.
Already addressed your faulty logic.
Why would I belabor a point to someone who keeps repeating the same failed argument? Batman 89's "timelessness" didn't last 3 years, the Nolan films have already remained contemporary for more than that. The end.
This new point you're arguing is entirely subjective and diversionary.
Always knew something was off about you.
I mean, Not even Lord of the Rings can stand to Star Wars.
Nothing can.
Ever.
Nothing can measure to Star Wars.
That is your opinion only, and does not render this statement hard fact.
I think SW is silly bull****, but that is my opinion only, its hardly some universal truth.
I just said that because Batman doesn't have the armies of nerds getting married to SW themed ceremonies or conventions or even their own ride at Disney.
Batman will be cherished but not the the amount that SW is. I don't think anything is. Not even Potter or LOTR or Twilight. all those have scary fanatics but not to the level of SW.
Can't believe this is even an argument. Clearly Nolan Batman is the better trilogy.
If you like a horrid third movie that spits on Batman, Catwoman, robin and Bane than yea.
If you like horrid prequels who spit on the entire universe, lore and turns an icon into a emo ***** than yeah.
I dont like the prequals either except for the third but the Bats trilogy doesnt have the same weight to it like the OT SW trilogy.
I just said that because Batman doesn't have the armies of nerds getting married to SW themed ceremonies or conventions or even their own ride at Disney.
Batman will be cherished but not the the amount that SW is. I don't think anything is. Not even Potter or LOTR or Twilight. all those have scary fanatics but not to the level of SW.
If you like horrid prequels who spit on the entire universe, lore and turns an icon into a emo ***** than yeah.