- Joined
- Mar 13, 2010
- Messages
- 28,316
- Reaction score
- 32,683
Actually on your first example she probed Owen in that loud boisterous threatening theatrical manner because she needed to get a message across to the town versus probing the one guy in a dark alley no theatrics needed she just went straight for the mind probe.I think it's a mixture of both (half-assing it *and* bad filmmaking. But I don't do brevity, so this post will be of no use to you.
The half-assing it comes in the form of not being able to develop an original storyline, and just going with the tired trope of "adult character down on his luck or missing something spends time protecting young kid who helps him gain perspective, personal growth, and wisdom." It's from the same playbook for writing character narratives as Rebels/Mando/Bad Batch. There's also half-assing it in the form of either not learning the established lore, or just ignoring it out of laziness.
The mix of half-assing and bad filmmaking comes in the form of a staggering number of plot conveniences. Same goes for there being very little that is ever earned in this series. Some examples:
- Reva suspects that Owen Lars knows about a Jedi fugitive and asks him some threatening questions. Reva later encounters a guy she also suspects knows about a Jedi fugitive but mind probes him. And it works. Why the inconsistency? Not clear (but it's because Owen knows where Kenobi is and the plot can't have that discovered yet).
- Reva knows Bail will call on Kenobi because those two used to work together. Why Bail and not one of the dozens of other senate associates of Kenobi (like Jar Jar or Mothma)? Not clear (but it's because Bail is Leia's father and the plot needs that).
- Obi-Wan goes from barely being able to move a tiny scrap with the Force to holding the ocean back while being distracted by stormtroopers in that very same episode. What caused the shift? Not clear (but it's because the same people who wanted a reflective story of a Jedi suffering effects of PTSD also want to have heroic "cool" scenes with the same Jedi in the same episode).
- Vader starts a fire and lifts Kenobi from the other side of that fire with the Force. He then extinguishes the fire to toss the one man he wants revenge against more than any living being. Fire starts again and Vader is rendered useless as Kenobi escapes *very slowly.* Why? Not clear (but it's because... aw screw it; it's because the writing sucks).
The lone survivor, hiding...
It's... Reva.
The townspeople heard her speech and got to witness her cutting that one lady's hand off. Point made; theatrics delivered. Then when nobody offered info to spare Owen's life, she doesn't leave without saying, "next time, Owen." Which would be fine if we didn't learn that she can probe minds with relative ease in the very next episode. Why bother with a next time?Actually on your first example she probed Owen in that loud boisterous threatening theatrical manner because she needed to get a message across to the town versus probing the one guy in a dark alley no theatrics needed she just went straight for the mind probe.
Also remember with Owen she was in the company of the other inquisitors and as much as she wanted it their mission was not Obi-Wan so the threatening theatrics for the town was sufficient enough.
In the alley she took advantage of being alone and went straight for the mind probe!
By the time she got to the alley on that planet she was already in full on backstabbing the other inquisitors mode where with Owen she was still not full Reva!
Besides it lead to my favorite exchange….
“REEEEEEEVAaaaaa!!”
And yet they don't always "cut fine," and that's going as far back as ESB and ROTJ. Heck on top of the barge Luke even swings it at a Gammorean Guard and knocks the rifle out of his hands without even cutting the rifle. So the laziness shown in that sequence obviously wasn't just about toning down the violence.Yes, it's shown that the Darksaber requires a clear mind to wield effectively. It's heavy and awkward to swing. Cuts fine though. Even in Mando's hands.
He struggles to swing it, but it still cuts very well. Doesn't hit like a blunt object.
That's all about handling, not about how effective the blade is at cutting.
Assuming normal lightsabers are the same, Obi-Wan being rusty just means he'd swing awkwardly but it'd cut fine.
Can you have a debate without making snippy comments?And yet they don't always "cut fine," and that's going as far back as ESB and ROTJ. Heck on top of the barge Luke even swings it at a Gammorean Guard and knocks the rifle out of his hands without even cutting the rifle. So the laziness shown in that sequence obviously wasn't just about toning down the violence.
So you either accept that lightsaber cutting is internally inconsistent from film to film and hold it against all the movies or you string together a common pattern shown on screen as a way of explaining it for all. I prefer the latter. Holding it against the Obi-Wan show while giving it a free pass in the OT and PT is silly IMO.
You can accept that a wielder's "mental state" (regardless of whether they know the Force) can literally change the very weight of the weapon in your hands but for somehow it's just too ridiculous to allow for that same mental state to explain the decades old inconsistency in how much damage they do?
Okay, have your double standards, whatever works for you. But at least my explanation covers all the movies without me having to turn a blind eye to one or willfully give a free pass to another.
Can you have a debate without making snippy comments?
Dang it, I don't mean to be. I'm just so annoyed with the new Jurassic World that I should probably just wait a while before posting anything. Lightsabers can do whatever you want, it's all good, lol.
Found it......but Titanic is on on FilmFourplus1.......Watching Jurassic Park 2 on UK TV right now as it happens.
Exactly how TLJ Luke was unjustly criticized.And yet they don't always "cut fine," and that's going as far back as ESB and ROTJ. Heck on top of the barge Luke even swings it at a Gammorean Guard and knocks the rifle out of his hands without even cutting the rifle. So the laziness shown in that sequence obviously wasn't just about toning down the violence.
So you either accept that lightsaber cutting is internally inconsistent from film to film and hold it against all the movies or you string together a common pattern shown on screen as a way of explaining it for all. I prefer the latter. Holding it against the Obi-Wan show while giving it a free pass in the OT and PT is silly IMO.
You can accept that a wielder's "mental state" (regardless of whether they know the Force) can literally change the very weight of the weapon in your hands but for some reason it's too ridiculous to allow for that same mental state to explain the decades old inconsistency in how much damage they do?
Okay, have your double standards, whatever works for you...
But at least my explanation covers all the movies without me having to turn a blind eye to one or willfully give a free pass to another.
And let me say that I do recognize that some "out of story" explanations for the inconsistencies are more tolerable than others (being charitable toward George if he briefly changed something to avoid some uncharacteristic gore, etc., vs. being inconsistent due to incompetence or laziness if that's how you see Obi-Wan.)No worries. We're here because we're passionate fans who care about this stuff, and it's OK to disagree.
Even though I'm not entirely convinced by your theory, it is quite a clever explanation to make sense of the dodgy lightsaber inconsistencies.
I saw your comment on the JW thread. **** shame about that movie. I didn't like Fallen Kingdom very much but hoped Dominion would end the new trilogy with a bang.
Watching Jurassic Park 2 on UK TV right now as it happens.
I never said you, or anyone else, couldn't voice your opinions.
I think it's a waste of time but, as I said before, to each their own.
Edit:
Let me clarify; it's not a waste of time to voice an opinion. I do think it's a waste of time to repeatedly complain about a show one supposedly dislikes yet continue to watch it weekly. Having said that, y'all do you. It makes no nevermind to me.
I thought this episode was a good one with a couple of moments but overall it was entertaining to me despite what the pretentious entertainment intellectuals in this thread say.
Enter your email address to join: