The customs area has been stinking for a long while. Time to open the windows and let some fresh air in.
I was joking earlier, but it does speak to the heart of the matter: who owns Andrew Lincoln's image? The artist who created a sculpt of it, the studio who paid for certain rights to it, or the man himself? To clarify the scenario, if Andrew Lincoln had access to a sculpt of his head made by WGP and wanted to recast it to make a figure of himself -- not for distribution, not as Rick Grimes, just a 1:6 figure of himself for his desk -- would that be okay?
I know of one well known member I've seen on Q's feedback more than once, Emarae. You think since he is always commending artist's work that he would have more respect for them than that. Especially being an artist himself.
I don't know, I see a big difference in TT knock offs and a custom sculpt. I can also see how you would have that argument, face.
Andrew owns his own likeness. AMC owns his likeness as it relates to any and all things Rick Grimes. An example would be if he appeared in a similar colored Sheriff uniform on another show, AMC could sue him. The only exemption from this would be a parody show like MAD Tv or SNL, but that would be up for a judge to decide if it was enough of a parody of the original character to qualify.
It's because all the heads he's selling originated from The Sideshow Freaks, and our artists.
they are not mass produced bodies from HT
Andrew owns his own likeness. AMC owns his likeness as it relates to any and all things Rick Grimes. An example would be if he appeared in a similar colored Sheriff uniform on another show, AMC could sue him. The only exemption from this would be a parody show like MAD Tv or SNL, but that would be up for a judge to decide if it was enough of a parody of the original character to qualify.
Wake was there several times as well.
Public figures don't have to sign releases to paparazzi.
So what?
I thought posting names was not allowed?
So what?
I thought posting names was not allowed?
Posting screen names is not allowed? Adopted Scot (a mod) even started a thread for people to cross check screen names with ebay IDs.
Given the info is public knowledge and there's even a thread here divulging ebay usernames, I don't see what the issue is.
Maybe some mods are up there?
this info is available without even needing a an ebay account, theres no "personal" information as its just user names...
I would say deleting the image is more likely to cause rumors and conspiracies than the posting. I think the image opened a can of worms that perhaps needs to be opened once and for all.
Which is why the sudden deletion of the image was extremely suspicious.
Public figures don't have to sign releases to paparazzi. And you forgot to quote the part of my post where I said I didn't care about legally.