Roddenberry didn't believe all people were equal. Clearly, Capt. Picard is way more competent, thoughtful, and self-assured than Lt. Barclay, and gets recognition for that. He just didn't believe that, in human socieity, capitalism would dictate access to material things.
But anyway, this whole Star Wars/Star Trek debate is illogical. I think we need Quark in here to school us on the Third Rule of Acquisition.
If you're using the analogy of franchises that have had fundamental reboots years after successful, earlier films, then I don't see the superhero movie trend as very different. We had a successful Superman movie franchise, then it lost its way. We then had a successful Batman movie franchise, that did the same, only to be rebooted, and do the same yet again. Now those franchises are both being rebooted for (at least) a third time (depending on how you classify the Schumacher films). We had X-Men, which has had hills and valleys, critical and commercial success-wise. Now we have Marvel Studios, which is a behemoth but is bound to lose its attractiveness sooner or later. But superhero movies have hung around for around 40 years at this point, just like Star Wars.
So did Marvel just take the idea from Pixar's The Incredibles?
Super Heroes have to be held accountable for their actions?
Tell them their identity or go into hiding?
I never read Civil War only what was on Wikipedia.
So did Marvel just take the idea from Pixar's The Incredibles?
Super Heroes have to be held accountable for their actions?
Tell them their identity or go into hiding?
I never read Civil War only what was on Wikipedia.
Feige:Ok guys, who ever wins the race gets to be the next Cap.
View attachment 204488
Enter your email address to join: