Biojex
Super Freak
- Joined
- Aug 25, 2008
- Messages
- 23,682
- Reaction score
- 173
It looks alright , watchable but I wouldn't cinema this , it looks like a straight up copy , am I imagining things or was this one supposed to be more truthful to the book or something ?. I thought it might take the film in a different direction but then again I've never read the book.
its a miscast. chloe is too cute and pretty to be carrie.
they should have chosen that chick who played hanna/lovely bones chick.
run on sentence.
Chloe actually looks better than the girls making fun of her and taunting her.
I mean seriously, Chloe could have played the cheerleader in the movie.
this whole thing just sucks.
True. She doesn't seem like the awkward type to be honest. Since she was so good in let me in I guess they gave her the role haha.
That's what I was hoping for myself. I loved "Let Me In".
Chloe actually looks better than the girls making fun of her and taunting her.
I mean seriously, Chloe could have played the cheerleader in the movie.
this whole thing just sucks.
Just saw the original Carrie movie for the first time.
In case no one has watched it, even though it was made in the 70s: !SPOILER ALERT!
Nah.. I really don't believe Chloe will outdo Sissy Spacek... she was extraordinary. You could clearly see how insecure she was, the torture and the pain in her eyes. Boy she had creepy eyes.
Chloe? Eh, I like her but I think she would have been great playing the girl who planned the whole pigs' blood thing at the prom instead. lol
my question
is this really a remake of the first movie?
or just another adaptation of the book?
Enter your email address to join: