EVILFACE
Insufferable S.O.B.
They are a decent team and were crushed.
The OU/Texass game will be interesting too. Both top ranked teams. I think OU gets the best of them though, Texas doesnt have running game.
College Football fans...
- Thread starter drbrad1975
- Start date
Help Support Collector Freaks Forum:
They are a decent team and were crushed.
The OU/Texass game will be interesting too. Both top ranked teams. I think OU gets the best of them though, Texas doesnt have running game.
How many teams has TCU played this year with a winning record? One, and that was Oklahoma. They are very average.
Although Texas' running game is much better than Oklahoma's I agree that Oklahoma will win.
gofourindian
Super Freak
You have that condescending ass part nailed. Also you're not as intelligent as you believe.
Yes, by all means! Do the Sooners a favor...jump ship. You won't be missed and the fan base IQ will jump.
You have that condescending ass part nailed. Also you're not as intelligent as you believe.
Yes, by all means! Do the Sooners a favor...jump ship. You won't be missed and the fan base IQ will jump.
So much irony in here.
gofourindian
Super Freak
This guys dictionary differs from most...I wouldn't waste my time. You know the type never wrong...must be a chick.
I agree with your view of the game...plus the Longhorn secondary is suspect.
gofourindian
Super Freak
WOW another meaningless post. You're on a roll. Definitely a chick......:chew
Your defensiveness explains a lot about your posts. As does the constantly having to go back and edit them.
Get a room you two.
gofourindian
Super Freak
Much better? Texas averages 20 more yards a game, genius. And Colt McCoy is their leading rusher.
gofourindian
Super Freak
You ^^^^^ like a chick too....
One's ranked 27th nationally the other ranked 40th. Yes, much better considering football is a game of inches.
gofourindian
Super Freak
Lets see....Chris Brown @ 4.7 ypr and Demarco Murray @ 5.1ypr have the majority of carries for OU are better than the main runningbacks for Texas who are under 4 yards a carry. Who has the better run game?
See post #271 to answer your question.
gofourindian
Super Freak
Yeah, thats what I thought
McCoys scrambling is Texas' running game and brings their rush average up....other than that they don't have one. OU's running game is better. Bradford doesn't have to run.
Yeah, thats what I thought
McCoys scrambling is Texas' running game and brings their rush average up....other than that they don't have one. OU's running game is better. Bradford doesn't have to run.
I'm not surprised it's what you thought.
Someone needs to tell Vince Young he should give back his national championship trophy and tell him his running didn't count.
gofourindian
Super Freak
And you know football...right? That Vince Young Texas team had running backs that rushed better than 3.9 yard per rush which took the focus off VY. What did he do the prior years with no running game genius? I feel like I'm talking to a child.
More football than you'll ever know. And prior to those years he rushed for the following....
998 yds. 7.4 avg. 11 TD
1079 yds. 6.5 avg. 14 TD
1050 yds. 6.8 avg. 12 TD National Title Year
Other than that though he did nothing. Clearly a non factor. You probably feel like you're talking to a child because it's who you best relate to and I've been trying to break it down so you can understand it.
gofourindian
Super Freak
Ahhh, there it is, the statement of someone who actually knows very little. Which is clear when you think meaningless computer rankings are relevant and deserve to be posted. Keep up the good work, Mr Football!
Ahhh, there it is, the statement of someone who actually knows very little. Which is clear when you think meaningless computer rankings are relevant and deserve to be posted. Keep up the good work, Mr Football!
Still waiting for you to quote me where I said they mean anything. Remember it's been established you've just been reading into things. Nice way to avoid the actual post though. Just put me on ignore and you don't have to read my posts.
edit: And finally before you put me on ignore, which I'm sure you won't anyway, but my statement you think means I know very little, which again I'm not surprised you're assuming again, actually means just that. I've been around the game, been in the game, and no more about the game then you. I'm not holding it above you, I'm just simply stating the truth. You can take offense, and call it what you will, it just is.
edit, edit: Seriously man, you take way to long to respond. 10 minutes a pop just sucks all the fun out of it. I'm hittin' the hay. BOOMER SOONER!
Last edited:
gofourindian
Super Freak
LOL I don't take offense to your statements. I consider the source and laugh it off. You give yourself way to much credit for many things. Such as how you, a faceless poster on an action figure board, could ever effect me, or that your statements are gospel. Those are good ones. But the best one is that I wait around for your replies to immediately respond. You're not that important and there are other more interesting things here than waiting for your posts. Sorry for bursting your bubble, chuckles.
So, you "no" more about the game "then" me huh? WOW, you just exude intelligence...Get a frakin dictionary!
Similar threads
