blackcoatcowboy
Just a little freaky
Comparing the two together, there are differences in the original "footprints."
1) The background, though similar, is different.
2) The original "footprints" arent as deep or as well defined.
The new "footprints":
1) Must come from a two-legged animal, otherwise, there would be additional prints from the rear and the patterns would be different.
2) The strides and area between the larger prints do not match distance and direction of travel.
3) Though bigger in size, the prints make less of an impression in the "dirt" than the smaller ones.
4) One of the smaller prints overshadow the larger ones in impressions and depth while one matches exactly.
1) The background, though similar, is different.
2) The original "footprints" arent as deep or as well defined.
The new "footprints":
1) Must come from a two-legged animal, otherwise, there would be additional prints from the rear and the patterns would be different.
2) The strides and area between the larger prints do not match distance and direction of travel.
3) Though bigger in size, the prints make less of an impression in the "dirt" than the smaller ones.
4) One of the smaller prints overshadow the larger ones in impressions and depth while one matches exactly.
Hunter footprints are up now... Everything says a new Jurassic Park piece but it almost seems too obvious...