Absolutely true.
They also can't love or create.
I disagree with you on that.
Absolutely true.
They also can't love or create.
Love is a completely different animal when you can choose it for yourself.
They don't love in the way we do.
I don't think that love is altruistic.
"I love..."
On it's face, it is pure egoism.
I think what would be selfless is treating your love as less important than yourself.
If making your love the thing you put first in your life, I don't understand the kind of tolerance for grotesque contradiction it would take to allow a person to call their actions selfless.
Alex Logan couldn't write that sentence.
Are you yourself? Or is you some how not your self?
Not altruism. Animals aren't capable of it.
If humans are, it's one of the things that sets us apart from them.
Absolutely true.
They also can't love or create.
Interesting...sounds pretty but with nothing to back it up that's all it is, a pretty thought.
But maybe you arrived at it by doing experiments and/or conducting extensive studies of wild animals from various classes from around the globe and/or doing extensive research. Not sure. Why don't you just tell us how you arrived this monumental conclusion?
A male black widow spider gives up it's life when it mates when it is eaten by it partner. It does it to provide her with food. What about a male hornbill? While the female is sealed inside of a tree for months with the chicks the male selflessly brings them food everyday for the entire time they are sealed inside. Female crocodiles bring there newborns to the water in their mouth and defend them for a week or two.
I don't think there's any contradiction between putting your love before you, and being selfish.
I think what would be selfless is treating your love as less important than yourself.
I hope that some day, I get the time to go back and read this thread. Becuase the most recent posts are mind-blowingly far-fetched in relation to altruism and I am very, very curious to see how the discussion got to where it is.