p!tu
Shiz-lakin-a-craka-lakin™
OMG It's P!tu!
I love your movies!
awesome papo! glad you like my vids man!!
Love that Comparative video! lol Team America is the ^^^^!!
OMG It's P!tu!
I love your movies!
You're barking up the wrong tree by using Nolan as an example of doing things right. I find Nolan's take on Batman to be as hilariously-inappropriate as Joel Schumacher's. Schumacher didn't take it seriously enough but Nolan takes it too seriously and ultimately they both miss the mark. I still think Christian Bale's Batman is one of the great comedic performances of all time.
Every property has its own appropriate tone and apparently Stephen Sommers understands this better than Christopher Nolan. Both G.I. Joe and Batman are dumb popcorn properties but only one of them had a director who tried to make a fun and entertaining movie.
But hey, if you want someone like Christopher Nolan to suck the fun out of some frivolous property by trying to make something serious and deep when it's not then more power to you.
Pretentiousness in entertainment is a grave sin as far as I'm concerned. Nolan is a huge offender and at the very least I respect Sommers for not being pretentious.
"G.I. Joe: The Rise of Cobra" earned a studio-estimated $100 million around the globe on its opening weekend, marking Paramount's third successful big-budget action movie of the summer, albeit the smallest one.
The film came in about $10 million under the opening weekend of "Star Trek," which earned $75.2 million domestically and about $35 million overseas. "G.I. Joe" did better internationally, where it grossed a studio-estimated $44 million, despite not yet launching in several key markets, including Germany and Italy. It underperformed "Trek" in the U.S. and Canada, where it opened to $56.2 million.
That's certainly good enough for Paramount to claim victory, however, and start thinking about the future. The studio's vice chairman, Rob Moore, confirmed that a sequel will soon go into development. The film's lead actors are contractually obligated to return for another film, though director Stephen Sommers is not.
There is reason to be concerned about whether "G.I. Joe" will fade quickly at the box office. The film experienced a sizable 18% drop in domestic ticket sales from Friday to Saturday, indicating audience word of mouth may not be great, despite a solid rating of B+ from opening-day moviegoers, according to market research firm CinemaScore. "Star Trek" saw its ticket sales increase from Friday to Saturday and went on to more than triple its opening-weekend gross.
why do you have to make me choose Scott? can't I have both?
Khev, my disappointment in you know no bounds on this one.
It's funny how some people feel so highbrow over a movie based on a cartoon...
agreed. What was SO bad about the movie, other than the two poor choices of leading men?
It's not like GI Joe is an epic masterpiece like Tolkien's LOTR that only someone as talented as PJ could pull off.
It's funny how some people feel so highbrow over a movie based on a cartoon...
It's not like GI Joe is an epic masterpiece like Tolkien's LOTR that only someone as talented as PJ could pull off. It's a cartoon about cool weapons and machinery, which is exactly what the movie included. I don't get all this talk about how horrible it is/was.
Hmm. Let's see... the script, the designs, the acting, half of the FX, the directing... are you sensing a trend yet? Seriously, what of those was GOOD?What was SO bad about the movie, other than the two poor choices of leading men?
Eye of the beholder. LOTR isn't anything special either.
That's the first problem. It shouldn't be based on the cheesy cartoon anymore than a Batman movie should be based on the Adam West show.
Where did I or anyone else here say we wanted that??There are plenty of serious and realistic war movies. If you want something based on reality, watch "Saving Private Ryan."
Well heck I went and saw the bloody thing and enjoyed it.
Channing Tatum and Sienna Miller obviously can't act their way out of a paper bag and Marlon Wayans getting Scarlett at the end made me want to throw up but I realized about a third of the way into it if this was some random GI Joe movie from yesteryear that played at midnight on TNT I'd probably get sucked in every time. Obviously a waste when you think about what could have been, but what can I say. I'm a sucker for ROTJ-style multi-battle finales and Sommers gave us a pretty lengthy one.
10 year old Snakes and SS? By far the biggest badasses in the film. Even moreso when you compare them to the likes of Jake Lloyd in TPM. Not the Joe movie I'd ever hope for them to make, but a guilty pleasure in the tradition of Batman Forever, X-Men 3, and parts of Independence Day.
If we get a TDK-esque reboot ROC will be even easier to stomach. Sommers left the Mummy franchise, maybe we'll get lucky and he'll let GI Joe go as well.
Enter your email address to join: