Gravity

Collector Freaks Forum

Help Support Collector Freaks Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Alfonso Cuaron Talks Putting Science Back In SciFi With GRAVITY | Badass Digest

Anyone still having reservations about Gravity, please read this full interview. After that you can continue to remain skeptical and choose to skip the IMAX screening, then instead watch it at home on the small BIG screen TV :).

What sucks is the one Legit Imax screen isn't showing. We have other Imax screens at certain theatres but I'm told they aren't Legit ones. Whatever that means.
 
What sucks is the one Legit Imax screen isn't showing. We have other Imax screens at certain theatres but I'm told they aren't Legit ones. Whatever that means.
That's too bad. I too have to settle down for a Digital IMAX digital screening (That too by traveling to another city). Still it is a bigger and better theatrical experience than the regular screen, though not the true IMAX experience.

Here are couple of articles that explains the real IMAX and Digital IMAX.

How To Tell a Real from Fake IMAX Theater | RandomTidbitsofThought (Short)

Q&A: How Do I Know If My IMAX Theatre is Real 70mm IMAX or lieMAX (Digital IMAX)? | /Film (Detailed)

So the AMC Rosedale 14 is not true IMAX near your area?
 
Saw a screener of this film yesterday in IMAX. Amazing visuals. The effects are incredible and its evident that they paid attention to every little technical detail, which is important to me when I watch a film like this.

That being said...this is just not my type of movie. Its really difficult for me to admit that since I love hard-core, cerebral Sci-fi. Maybe its because I found it to be more "fiction" than "science-fiction"...I'm not even sure to be honest. I always hate when I hear some one say "2001" is a boring film, yet I find myself saying the same about Gravity.
Still, I have to recommend watching it if not for the visuals alone. Plus I'm sure many of you will like it more than I did.
 
Director Darren Aronofsky and Rian Johnson on Gravity.

10050946645_a27b8dd6f0_o.png
 
I want to see this, but then I don't. I guess I'm afraid of how it will make me feel. :(
 
More or less, it's just that. Sounds boring. The movie is 90 minutes LONG.
 
Saw a screener of this film yesterday in IMAX. Amazing visuals. The effects are incredible and its evident that they paid attention to every little technical detail, which is important to me when I watch a film like this.

That being said...this is just not my type of movie. Its really difficult for me to admit that since I love hard-core, cerebral Sci-fi. Maybe its because I found it to be more "fiction" than "science-fiction"...I'm not even sure to be honest. I always hate when I hear some one say "2001" is a boring film, yet I find myself saying the same about Gravity.
Still, I have to recommend watching it if not for the visuals alone. Plus I'm sure many of you will like it more than I did.

I preferred 2010 myself.
 
Just saw this. Great performances, fantastic use of sound, and I don't think I've ever seen better visual effects. A really good looking film :rock
 
Sandra Bullock and Clooney in space movie? Is this the 90's again?... Needs moar aliens.

Sent from my GT-N7100 using Tapatalk 4
 
Jeremy jahns gave this awesometacular and will be in his top ten list for best films of the year. Sounds good to me
 
Really amazing movie, the visuals are just incredible. And the sound design is also amazing---if you can go to a theater with Dolby Atmos you won't be disappointed, this is the best use of the system and sounds change positions all around you as the camera is moving.
And for those that don't like Bullock, she is very much not herself in this movie, a really fantastic job.
 
People who are still looking forward to Gravity, check out Buzz Aldrin's thoughts on the film.

'Gravity' Review by Astronaut Buzz Aldrin

"I was so extravagantly impressed by the portrayal of the reality of zero gravity. Going through the space station was done just the way that I've seen people do it in reality. The spinning is going to happen -- maybe not quite that vigorous -- but certainly we've been fortunate that people haven't been in those situations yet. I think it reminds us that there really are hazards in the space business, especially in activities outside the spacecraft.

I was happy to see someone moving around the spacecraft the way George Clooney was. It really points out the degree of confusion and bumping into people, and when the tether gets caught, you're going to be pulled -- I think the simulation of the dynamics was remarkable.

We were probably not as lighthearted as Clooney and Sandra Bullock. We didn't tell too many jokes when people were in some position of jeopardy outside the spacecraft, but I think that's the humanity coming through in the characters. This movie gave great clarity to looking down and seeing the features of Earth … but there weren't enough clouds, and maybe there was too precise a delineation from space.

I know: If you're looking down at Earth, you're looking through an atmosphere that has a bit of haze in many places and not just occasional clouds. Here, the precision was remarkable, though you might need a pretty good spy telescope to see that well.

We're in a very precarious position of losing all the advancements we've made in space that we did 40 years ago, 50 years ago. From my perspective, this movie couldn't have come at a better time to really stimulate the public. I was very, very impressed with it."
 
Back
Top