Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows Movie SPOILERS!

Collector Freaks Forum

Help Support Collector Freaks Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Got to see it on Friday... really pleased overall with the film. Few nits from the book to the film, but overall I think they did an amazing job.

Snapes sequences were particularly powerful and I really was more emotionally moved than I expected to be. Great film and a great ending to the series.
 
Gotta agree with everyone here. If you go in to the movie looking for character development you will be disappointed. If you go in looking to see a badass battle between good and evil then you will be happy.

And Snape definitely stole the show.
 
Gotta agree with everyone here. If you go in to the movie looking for character development you will be disappointed. If you go in looking to see a badass battle between good and evil then you will be happy.

And Snape definitely stole the show.

I loved Snape from the very first moment I saw him on screen. I could have done with a few hundred more scenes with him. There was always something about him. At the very first second I saw him, I was drawn to him. Good thing he's not real or I'd stalk him. :lol As great as Rickman is (and yes I'd love to meet him) my crush is on Snape.

I think that Jo did an amazing job creating him and giving him such a complex story. Definitely her best creation without a doubt.
 
Like i said, skip Bayformers and watch Harry Potter twice :lecture

I might go see it again as well :yess:


Now THIS is a movie well deserved of the money it will make. What a great movie and conclusion. Well done Harry Potty! Wizards and magic, or Giant Robots and bad humor. ONE of these is clearly the superior combo! :hi5:
 
Another sold out couple of theaters last night when we went again. It was great. The movie was better upon a second viewing. what I tried to do was
Ignore Harry and watch what was going on around him. The battle. Though it's not as clear as I'd like to see it, it was still enjoyable.

can't wait for a 3rd viewing.
 
this movie should have been called...

Harry Potter: Salvation

....if you can hear this, you are the resistance.
-Harry Potter

:lol
 
From David Yates:

We caught up to Yates and Kloves at the Potter junket, and they told us about the changes they made to the film.

First up, what was on the Potter cutting room floor?

David Yates: We've got a whole bunch of DVD [deleted] scenes that we took out of the movie. We never, ever say oh it's going to be three hours, of three and a half hours, or 90 minutes. It's whatever feels right when watch the film alone in the dark. Ultimately that's what determines the length of the film. And this film felt the right weight, and the right shape and the right rhythm, at two hours. But we saved all the bits that we cut out, and we're going to put that on the DVD extras.

There's a version of Aberforth and Harry — a longer version of it that we got. There's an extended scene on the beach with Ron disguised (before he gets to the bank, there's a lovely little interchange with him and Bellatrix Lestrange.) There are a number of things that we have for the DVD.

Why did you change the Great Hall Battle?

David Yates: In the book, they circle each other in The Great Hall in front of lots of students. I wanted to extend it across the school, I thought it was a great visual opportunity to see those two figures fighting amongst the rubble, through different parts of the school. And I was sitting in my garden trying to think of a way to give it a bit of extra meaning. Because two guys fighting all the time kind of gets exhausting after awhile. I came up with this notion of Harry just looking at Voldemort while they're on this precipice, and pulling him over. That was my eureka moment in the garden while I was having a cup of tea. And I thought that could be really beautiful, these two figures just tumbling into the abyss and then conjoining in this weird way. If would be quite haunting and expressive.

There was actually more battle between the two of them. There's a moment, which you probably saw in early trailers, where Voldemort is looking at Harry in the eye and he says, "Why do you live?" And then Harry says, "Because I have something, to live for." It was a really cool moment. I actually asked Steve to write it. I said Steve we've waited eight movies, I want Voldemort to say something and Dan [Radcliffe] to respond. And of course when I put it in the movie, and the reason that Steve didn't write it in the first place was because, Voldemort would just kill Harry. They wouldn't stop and have a conversation. It was in the movie and you had this slightly longer sequence of them fighting. When you pull it out of the trailer it looks quite cool, but in context it felt slightly belabored and a little self conscious. So we kind of lost it.

Why did you choose to add in the scene in The Great Hall with Snape?


Steve Kloves: It's not the way the original script was. It evolved. And that happens in these sometimes. It become about compression, and a feeling, and how can we reveal the emotion of it most succinctly? That's what always ruled the day.

I liked particularly in The Great Hall one moment… [Harry] seeing Snape standing where Dumbledore would stand, and saying, "How dare you stand there, where he stood?" That's really what the emotion of it was for Harry. That he [Snape] would defile this place by killing the head master. That was the best way to express that visual. That's a good example. To me that's a good move, for us. Because it's a visual and a literary stroke. And that's what we tried to do in Potter, rather than always be in lockstep with the book, although emotionally we're absolutely in lockstep with the books. Which was always our guide.
 
Deleted scenes are great and all, but I'd prefer to buy a version that has these scenes directly in the movie, not as an extra. Anyone else?
 
I concur. But then I've always wished they would do extended editions with subplots that were left out of the script.
 
Snape's sequences was like Trent Reznor/NIN's perfect drug.:monkey3
[ame="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5MvsyNSk20Q"]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5MvsyNSk20Q[/ame]
 
Mr Yates, I think your Eureka moment was a dumb idea. These two were battling each other over and over and it should have come down to them squaring off one final time. I'm amazed he realized it would be un Voldemort to speak to Harry but he didn't see it as un Voldemort hugging Draco. Voldemort would have absolutely no use for a hug. I think they should have added the kings cross dialogue that explained the elder wand, the use of Harry's blood in the resurrection and its consequences. They should have kept Harry explaining it to Voldemort who fires his spell anyway, and done a slow motion scene where he sees the green light rebounding at him, striking him and his lifeless body falls in an inglorious heap. But what do I know?
 
Deleted scenes are great and all, but I'd prefer to buy a version that has these scenes directly in the movie, not as an extra. Anyone else?

And that's why there's such a thing as "fan edits" but they're not easy to find and it's not excatly legal what those guys are releasing so I better stop talking now.
 
I liked the way Chris Columbus handled the first two, Alfonso the third and even Mike Newell's take on Goblet. I believe from number 4 they should have either made them 3 hours (which would have been fine!) or extended them to two films. But, I believe for Goblet it came out pretty well for what it was. It is in my opinion though that when Yates took over, it all went down hill. And you MUST have read the books before you come at me and complain. Book readers, I welcome your debates.
 
Back
Top