Rayman
Freaked Out
SoA was FX.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/76a78/76a785676c0f36e3b655c475d39f3f1a6beea029" alt="Slap :slap :slap"
SoA was FX.
I loved it too, it’s still one of the most underrated series of all time imo, but the last season was rushed as hell. Some say the just wanted to end it since he had more projects. Just remember that 1924 to 1931 jump, missing the crack, and Arnold Rothstein just disappearing… what a sin that was. If that happened today with a hit series such as GoT or TLoU, the showrunner would have to look for asylum in another country.I love Boardwalk what went wrong there?
Ugh, don't get me started on Boardwalk Empire. Killing off a favorite character prematurely took a lot of wind out of that show's sails...True, I’m a spaniard so sometimes I get confused with all the networks, specially since here they come through other platforms. Well, lets substitute it with Boardwalk Empire as another example of HBO messing up production.
I think they had said at one point that they envisioned TLOU2 being two seasons, and that they didn't want to drag the show out.Really curious how they handle next season. Do they end after that? Do they stretch the game into 2 seasons? Do they go beyond the games like GoT with the books? Or do they just stop after 2 seasons?
The problem is:So he gave up on humanity just to have time with a new pretend daughter?
Humanity IS sad.
The problem is:
The series was so poorly executed and (as I've complained the whole way along) missed all of the character building and nuances of the games phenomenal writing and execution.
So what you're saying, sir, is absolutely correct... in context to this lackluster **** show.
However, in the game, in makes perfect sense and makes the ending so heartbreaking, for so many different reasons (including what you mentioned). Unfortunately it has all been squandered here; because of what? I don't know? Egos? Agendas? Lack of budget? I just don't get it.
Monstrously missed opportunity.
At least for those that weren't blinded by the "goggles" is was evident from early on how unsatisfying this ending was going to be.
Next...
Yeah some of these criticisms are far too harsh imo. Was the show as good as the game? Not really, but it was still a pretty good show overall. I think in some aspects it was better than the game.I think it's discourteous to say that, because you didn't enjoy it, those that did are branded as having 'goggles'. Sure it has its pitfalls, but it certainly wasn't a ****show.
I think it's discourteous to say that, because you didn't enjoy it, those that did are branded as having 'goggles'. Sure it has its pitfalls, but it certainly wasn't a ****show.
Have to agree to disagree.
The "goggles" are people's level of "letting things slide" in my eyes. I barely let anything slide these days which is my own issue, and thus, I don't enjoy much anymore because so many things are just dialed in and decisions made for wrong reasons (to many fingers in the pie these days - again, you can count the amount of film auteurs left in the business on one hand).
I grew up in a time where the script was everything - yet barely anyone at the decision end of the business (except for the "dumb" creatives) care about scripts anymore. A lot of producers don't even read the script. It's all a clinical equation, and if the numbers "work" the project gets greenlit - even if the script is complete ass.
I guess I'm jealous of the "goggles." I wish I could look past things and let things slide, but I can't...
And so, to me, it was a **** show because it failed to evoke even 1/100th of the emotions the game did. Even at a basic storytelling level it was all over the place and full of - as you said - pitfalls.
But if people enjoyed it, that's great... I just can't see anyone giving a **** about this in 10 years time like they still do the game.