1/6 Hot Toys Avengers: Endgame - Armored Thanos

Collector Freaks Forum

Help Support Collector Freaks Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Damn. Would love that !

Imagine how much it'd be worth !

8d56abcdc40dcb91854b83ea3fdb62e7.jpg



Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

A bunch of squiggly lines:dunno :lol
 
I just saw the movie, but am I crazy or did Thanos never have the gold gauntlet on his left hand while wearing the armor? [emoji848]


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
 
I just saw the movie, but am I crazy or did Thanos never have the gold gauntlet on his left hand while wearing the armor? [emoji848]


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

Correct. There is a rant video done by Danoby2 talking about this very issue. I'm curious if HT will address this. In a sense it would be cool to have both the armor, gauntlet and his blade, but on the other it would be nice to also make it movie accurate. Honestly, I don't really care either way. I do hope they include the gauntlet with Iron Man.
 
I just saw the movie


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

No you're not crazy, he never had this look with the gauntlet ever in this film or the first one. Plus he only wore the Stark/Hulk Gauntlet on his right hand in the movie, so completely different. This look with the gauntlet only makes sense if you remove some of the stones so it's a beginning of IW look.

But I do understand how some people want this look, it's just not film accurate.
 
Just curious, but to those who have the Infinity War Thanos, can he be posed sitting down? I’m hoping this could too.
 
I personally prefer this version of Thanos because:

It’s accurate to both IW (more less, sans five stones) and EG (just use the regular hands on both arms).
 
Reeeeeeaaaaaally hoping they won’t
replace the current gauntlet and, if anything, add the Stark gauntlet as a bonus.

That would be a total bait-and-switch if they did. It would be illegal, right? Please tell me that won’t happen. :lol
 
Reeeeeeaaaaaally hoping they won’t
replace the current gauntlet and, if anything, add the Stark gauntlet as a bonus.

That would be a total bait-and-switch if they did. It would be illegal, right? Please tell me that won’t happen. :lol

They can do whatever they want because it says this on everything they sell.

"**Product details could be subjected to change without further notice"
 
I'd be very upset if the final figure did not come with the currently pictured IW gauntlet but I'll be very pleased if it ends up coming with... an extra accessory not currently pictured.
 
I'd be very upset if the final figure did not come with the currently pictured IW gauntlet but I'll be very pleased if it ends up coming with... an extra accessory not currently pictured.

Exactly, I'm of the same opinion. That said, I would also purchase "said extra accessory" from a third party supplier should it come to that.
 
Reeeeeeaaaaaally hoping they won’t
replace the current gauntlet and, if anything, add the Stark gauntlet as a bonus.

That would be a total bait-and-switch if they did. It would be illegal, right? Please tell me that won’t happen. :lol

A bait and switch is what they did with Chadwick/BP2.0 headsculpt...that was def 100% illegal!!!
 
Back
Top