uscmhicks
Super Freak
MJ and Leonidas both have there legs a little bent , Leonidas's even coming off the stand a little , that plus the heeled boots makes Arnold that bit taller. I don't think its an issue.
Absolutley bad ass. What an awesome figure.
Height looks good. Leonidas looks a bit short at being even with MJ.
I wonder if we would be talking about this at all if Lance Henriksen would have got the part lol.
I think Henriksen would have put on a bad-ass performance, but nothing nearly as influential as what Arnold did. The menace he brought due to his size was really important. Plus, his lack of acting range was actually a good thing for that role.
I think Henriksen would have put on a bad-ass performance, but nothing nearly as influential as what Arnold did. The menace he brought due to his size was really important. Plus, his lack of acting range was actually a good thing for that role.
There's definitely something even about Arnie's face that just really pulls of that robotic sort of expression, from the neck down, other strong men could do the same as Arnold, but something about his face just really works for being a lifeless, determined robot on the warpath.
Henriksen was a badass unstoppable killing machine in Near Dark and did a good job. And he wasn't hyped up on crack, either. Like I said, I think the imposing size was a good thing, and is the largest part of why Arnold was a better choice for this role. But Terminator would have still worked with a smaller guy (just not as well). Like a previous poster said, look at the T-1000. Henriksen is a far better actor than Arnold, and I'm sure could have been intimidating in the role. Maybe not physically, but he could give those vibes for sure.Vocally, yes but that's handicapped by his accent too. Physically you couldn't be more off the mark. I couldn't buy Henriksen as a badass unstoppable killing machine. Maybe a rabid psychopath hyped up on crack, but not an emotionless Terminator. Schwarzenegger owned that role like no other person in Hollywood could've done.
I disagree. The timing in his physical acting really sold it. I equate that more to his time spent bodybuilding and the study of ballet and other dance forms. Much the same way cha cha helped Bruce with Kung Fu. From the strut, to ripping out hearts, to drawing pistols, etc., it could easily have wound up looking hokey and awkward, but from his very first scene, viewers were sold and remained that way for the rest of the film.
Henriksen was a badass unstoppable killing machine in Near Dark and did a good job. And he wasn't hyped up on crack, either. Like I said, I think the imposing size was a good thing, and is the largest part of why Arnold was a better choice for this role. But Terminator would have still worked with a smaller guy (just not as well). Like a previous poster said, look at the T-1000. Henriksen is a far better actor than Arnold, and I'm sure could have been intimidating in the role. Maybe not physically, but he could give those vibes for sure.
Oh I'm not saying his whole physicallity didn't sell it, I was just saying that something about Arnold's face, which no one without surgery can match, was a big factor in selling his character as a mindless robot beneath. The performance with his body can be copied, but the structure of his face, his cheekbones, the way his lips look, the eyes, the man just looks something non-human with that cold look on his face.
Not really, not with any real success. Kickinger tried to match Arnold's performance for T:S and none of us really bought him as the T-800.
Enter your email address to join: