pjam
Here on the Perimeter
Up for PO at AE for 145.
Okay, well a couple of you guys just lost all credibility for me.
Tatum is shot down in the same scene he appears in, 10 minutes into the film, and has one whole line. That hardly seems fit to ruin an entire movie if you ask me. That annoying ass Nation's Pride 'actor' that DOES NOT GO AWAY from the entire second and third acts of IB however, made the film nearly unwatchable. He reminded me of the jackass older brother from Step Brothers. In fact, I was wondering if it was the same guy, doing the same performance.
And there is nothing wrong with Mann's camera work. He could take QT to school. Listen to a commentary from each filmmaker. The sheer level of thought and design put into each of Mann's films, characters, scenes, and arks is just staggering, where as Tarintino seems to have less values to share and rests on his popular image. Again, I'm a fan of both filmmakers, but back me up into a corner, and Pulp Fiction is no match for Heat, just as IB is none for PE.
And the digital stock, is just a stylistic choice. Might not be for everyone, but I rather enjoy his bold attempts to show me a film that looks different, and sets it apart from the pack. Again, a choice, kind of like IB's lead barely being in this snooze fest, or the whole plot revolving around something different every five scenes until it just ends on the only satisying moment since the last time we saw Pitt being a Basterd, which was about two hours ago at the front of the film.
Differing opinions are fine, but some of you are starting to get a little playground for me.
I'm about done with this ignorant thread. The figure is weak anyway.
Are you happy with the headsculpt, bud? Becuase I know you were really waiting on this one.
Whos AE????
I would have preferred the smirk sculpt too - but I don't think anyone can deny this likeness is fantastic. And it's very reminiscent of the speech in the beginning, which is probably what they were going for. I'm sure they started this before the poster image with Pitt with his chin out became so iconic. And they said in the newsletter that this was the toughest likeness approval they every went through - which means that a second or substitute head is unlikely, because they'd have to do it all over again.
But I like it, and the overall figure quite a bit. I just hope he's not the only character from the film we get.
As for the film - I mentioned it in the previous thread, but I really want to hate every QT movie that comes out, just because of his public persona. But Pulp Fiction is in my top ten movies of all time. I didn't like Death Proof and I don't like Reservoir Dogs. But I absolutely loved Kill Bill (it's just one film - ask Quentin) and IB. Comparing Michael Mann to QT is like comparing Tony Scott to Ridley Scott. They are both good, but one is so obviously superior to the other.
Okay, well a couple of you guys just lost all credibility for me.
Tatum is shot down in the same scene he appears in, 10 minutes into the film, and has one whole line. That hardly seems fit to ruin an entire movie if you ask me. That annoying ass Nation's Pride 'actor' that DOES NOT GO AWAY from the entire second and third acts of IB however, made the film nearly unwatchable. He reminded me of the jackass older brother from Step Brothers. In fact, I was wondering if it was the same guy, doing the same performance.
And there is nothing wrong with Mann's camera work. He could take QT to school. Listen to a commentary from each filmmaker. The sheer level of thought and design put into each of Mann's films, characters, scenes, and arks is just staggering, where as Tarintino seems to have less values to share and rests on his popular image. Again, I'm a fan of both filmmakers, but back me up into a corner, and Pulp Fiction is no match for Heat, just as IB is none for PE.
And the digital stock, is just a stylistic choice. Might not be for everyone, but I rather enjoy his bold attempts to show me a film that looks different, and sets it apart from the pack. Again, a choice, kind of like IB's lead barely being in this snooze fest, or the whole plot revolving around something different every five scenes until it just ends on the only satisying moment since the last time we saw Pitt being a Basterd, which was about two hours ago at the front of the film.
Differing opinions are fine, but some of you are starting to get a little playground for me.
I'm about done with this ignorant thread. The figure is weak anyway.
Ha! Defeated. Owned. Pwned whatever. Fact of the matter is, Film >>>> Digital Histroy Channel Documentary style.
And I love how you deciede to troll the thread, Insult people, and then back out like you're the villian.
Not liking the movie is fine. But you have to express yourself the correct way...well...unless you're not gonna back down, and continue arguging.
This is going to be like Leonidas with HT dropping a second "iconic" sculpt at the last minute.
Enter your email address to join: