Hologram AI
Super Freak
- Joined
- May 7, 2013
- Messages
- 10,972
- Reaction score
- 13,540
The texture and finish was just fine on the prototype. So bizarre how they decided to crank it up to 11 on the production.
I honestly don't get what happened in production because the proto was so good! No stone texture then production boom! Who ever passed this needs to be fired.It was on track to be amazing, I don’t know what happened to the suit. They also made the battle damaged version.
View attachment 717870
View attachment 717871
View attachment 717872
Love those acrylic logos.
The 2.0 may have a better set of eye balls and a nicer cape.
But for me the DX09 still remains king.
View attachment 717952
Eh? I thought the 2.0 corrected it...One thing i noticed, is that the bat emblem on the 2.0 is too small, where as the DX09's bat emblem is the correct size.......
Nope, if you look at pics from the 89 Batman movie, you'll see the bat emblem on the suit is the same as on the DX09 [ someone should post pics from the movie, and post pics of the DX09 and 2.0 for comparison ]...........Eh? I thought the 2.0 corrected it...
Wasn't it too large on the 1.0? I'm pretty sure it was.
Yeah it’s hard to get past. Especially after seeing these pics of the prototype Nick D pulled up where it looked great. There shouldn’t be a single detail that was better/more accurate on a twelve year old figure.Man the suit difference...
It was on track to be amazing, I don’t know what happened to the suit. They also made the battle damaged version.
View attachment 717870
View attachment 717871
View attachment 717872
Yeah, the DX logo is ridiculously oversized2.0 logo is the correct one, DX09 is not.
I don't think those prices include shipping.Does anyone know if Toy Buying Agent/Timcent88 price includes free postage? I know he used to do on Ebay.
Enter your email address to join: