It's the first time it's happened to me now from .com but for god sake say which one. There's two! .com and (.co.uk the credit card scammers) the amount of people that does not explicitly state which one is shocking.![]()

It's the first time it's happened to me now from .com but for god sake say which one. There's two! .com and (.co.uk the credit card scammers) the amount of people that does not explicitly state which one is shocking.![]()
i hope .co.uk one isn't scammers because i ordered my MSDX from there...uh oh
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=57jbokPrGjM
dont know if its been posted yet but nice little review of dx joker.
This is not my video props go to oldsnake22
v1 and v2 and all that, it started out as just a few of us here using it as a way to define the different heads between the initial figure and the BR extra head.
Ahem... been using the terms V1 and V2 and such since the Century Joker (Nicholson) and during the mass Bat attack that was Sovereign's Keaton Batman...and methinks it goes back much further than that.
I am the Fantasy-Smasher.
Ahem... been using the terms V1 and V2 and such since the Century Joker (Nicholson) and during the mass Bat attack that was Sovereign's Keaton Batman...and methinks it goes back much further than that.
I am the Fantasy-Smasher.
Well Hellllllllooooooo Mr. Fancy Pants.
I can't remember but didn't HT even refer to their first Joker figure as the "v1" when they announced the BR Joker and showed the sculpt comparisons?
I think they did after the fact, meaning after the BR got announced. If they had blatantly called the first Joker the V1, then I wouldn't have got it.
No I know..I meant in that article (Milk!?) that showed the main BR sculpt ON the v1 Joker. I think that was the first time they called it "v1". Yeah that's a bad sign if a company releases a figure called "v1".
![]()
Yeah that's a bad sign if a company releases a figure called "v1".![]()