Fan speculation.
They had enough reference. The Bank Robber Joker was in development at the same time as the V1.
Is this HT stated fact or fan speculation?
They were literally only mere months apart.
That's a big difference. They could easily NOT have had references during V1 development and then, only a few months later, have references as they enter BR Joker development. Why is this so hard to believe?
As soon as the Bank Robber version showed up, that's all they did was display the Bank Robber head on the V1, as if that was their plan all along.
Of course that's all they did, but that doesn't mean it was "their plan all along" and that they deliberately put out a bad head to make you buy another figure for the good head.
All it does mean is that they're good salesmen and know to hype a superior product once they have one to offer.
This is what they based the V1 off of. This was their reference.
Look at how different these promo pic expressions are, from the movie that we know and from the Hot Toys sculpts that we now praise. Even the shape of his head and mouth seem weird. That third pic looks like a monkey face.
It's no wonder that the v1 also looks so different - it's based on these terrible promo pics (which I believe were taken so the guys at Mattel could have something to work with for their kid action figure line).
Lets remember Bank Robber Joker was shown in August of 2008.
Let's consider that V1 Joker came out before the movie, and so was easily in development six months prior to that - so it clearly could have had a six month (or more) lead on BR Joker in development. Not to mention that, six months before the movie, the number of quality source pics were QUITE limited (the first theatrical trailer only came out in December).
Nolan's known for his secrecy, and Hot Toys wasn't the big player at the time that it is now. Knowing how some of the marketing for that movie worked, I can tell you that it's very possible Hot Toys wasn't given enough good source pics at the time. (Also, recall that the 1/6 game wasn't nearly as detailed as it is now - it's very possible that WB simply did not realize the importance of getting better pics to Hot Toys, because nobody knew what they were capable of yet).
So she cranked out that headsculpt in a few weeks (or less considering it came out much later in Asia)? ...Yeah, I doubt that. I'd imagine it takes a little more than a few weeks to make a figure.
I think it's incredibly feasible that an artist, working as their full-time job on a headsculpt, could crank out a good one within a few weeks (if not a few days!), if it's their primary project. These are professionals, not divas selling suits and heads for $1000 a pop.
I think it's also feasible that Hot Toys put this one on the priority list, anticipating how huge "The Dark Knight" and Ledger's Joker would be. At the time, it certainly would have looked to be their most promising figure yet, profitability-wise!
I also think that they could crank out the other stuff (clothing, accessories) pretty damn quickly too. BR Joker doesn't have rubber suits or really intricate parts - it's mostly fabric, conventional clothing, easily-done grenade accessories, and a few typical guns (one of which they already had the mold for, for V1 Joker).
We're used to long development times, but this was done when HT was less busy (fewer releases) and it wasn't a "Batman" or "Iron Man" figure with a complicated suit, so it would've been easier to prototype produce.
I'm sure V1 and Bank Robber Joker were in the works simultaneously.
Do you have a source for this, or is it (contrary to what you stated otherwise) merely your fan speculation?
The plan I'm sure was to get people to buy both (no problem there) and to swap out the V1 head with regular BR head. Which everyone had done.
I think that was the plan after BR Joker went into development (hence, two heads), but you seem to be implying that V1 Joker was deliberately inaccurate so that they could make people by BR Joker later as well, which there is no evidence for.
More telling of this is the first ever pic of the prototype Bank Robber head that was in a catalog,
That's the V1 as a stand in.
How is that "telling" of anything? They didn't have the BR Joker head ready for the catalog, so they used pics of the head that they already DID have, the V1 Joker, as that had already been released. All you're doing is proving my point - that clearly there was significant development time in between V1 Joker and BR Joker, and that window of time could easily account for a discrepancy in availability of source materials.
And they didn't have enough reference? Yeah, that's crap. They had all those promo pics and stills from WB at their disposal for the V1.
Like I said, those promo pics and stills pretty much sucked.