SoGS
Super Freak
If the extra height is coming from the new articulated torso, I hope they're not taking that measurement from when it's pulled apart. That'd be some ****.
I'm glad it's taller then the Mark 3 . I just checked and compared before preorder .
If it's the new torso giving it the extra height isn't that just going to put it out of proportion?
Sent from my iPod touch using Tapatalk
I'm betting it's the exact same height and that the specs on Sideshow isn't accurate.If it's the new torso giving it the extra height isn't that just going to put it out of proportion?
Sent from my iPod touch using Tapatalk
If the extra height is coming from the new articulated torso, I hope they're not taking that measurement from when it's pulled apart. That'd be some ****.
I'm betting it's the exact same height and that the specs on Sideshow isn't accurate.
It's the exact same mold but they just did a cut along the chest and added a small joint under there to allow the upper chest to move. Visually all the panel lines and proportions match with the Diecast Mark 3. I don't see how the chest could have given it some kind of height without them changing the proportions on everything else.
Ya, but to be fair, when Rhodey flies the suit to the Air Force base in IM2, the suit looks a lot more like the colour on the new figure...
I think I'm lost. I'm trying to understand why so many think certain armors are too short. Is there some movie reference site that specifically lists the height of all the armors? Should all the armors be the same height? ( with the exception of the over sized armors of course ). Is it simply a desire to want uniformity? Please bring me into the light.
( honest question. Not meant to incite )
There is a wiki that shows all armors and their stats.
Do you have a link? The only one I found lists everything at 6'0" or 6:5"
https://ironman.wikia.com/wiki/Iron_Man_3
This picture shows the difference in height to be quite a lot. Personally it's not the overall height for me as I would display it standing next to another IM (unless in a hall of armour where it wouldn't be overly obvious), but for me it's more the proportions. I think longer legs would solve a lot of that, as it is the mk3 looks a little stunted (I still have and like the figure though) so I hope the mkII does get updated a little.
Edit: damn, quoted the wrong picture instead of the one with no bases. But you can still compare quite well!
I have every armor and know there is as much as an inch in height difference. I was curious to know if there is any reference material online or print or anywhere that lists all 46 armors and what their height is. Or if it is simply personal preference that some want uniformity? Like Furyan posted or proportions like you posted. It can't possibly be the link I posted. Every armor is listed as either 6'0", 6'5" .
Some are even listed as USER'S HEIGHT.
Enter your email address to join: