Nolan's & Ledger's will probably be the closest we ever get to the old school 60+ years of The Joker. No offense to those who like him, just not my taste.
I think you mean William Dozier and Cesar Romero.
Joker isn't a dirty vagrant that spews amatuer philosophical ideas, licks his lips, and wears his mom's make up. Ledger was as much a product of the try hard, Hot Topic crowd as Jared Leto. Both were "method" as well. Neither fit the bill of "clown prince of crime", both cater towards an edgy, nilisitic teenagers.
What Ledger's version got right was just the craziness and random nonsense he would do with no rhyme or reason. Unpredictable behavior that makes you realize this guy is truly nuts.. William Dozier and Cesar Romero from the old 1966 show were too campy and not frightening or threatening enough, but did have the classic look. Never really cared for Nicholson. Didn't really like his look or acting. He just came across as pretending to be crazy due to his situation and accident. Not genuinely crazy..
None of them are definitive or closer to being an "old school" Joker than the other. They're all just different interpretations and a far cry from the 1940s Joker.
There's a key component that his Joker has on all other versions that has been important to the character for 23 years, and that's Harley Quinn and his relationship with her.
There will never be a definitive Joker. Each generation has their own Joker. This generations Joker is still Ledger, although that's about to change with the arrival of Leto. Plus Leto has the chance of featuring in multiple movies now so will no doubt dominate the Joker market for the next ten years plus.
So where does that leave Ledger, same place he's now along with Nicholson and every other actor or voice actor that played the Joker. He's a fan favorite. Leto will join that club eventually, and fans will endlessly debate which version is the "real" Joker
Will the real Joker please stand up!...
I'd rep if I could
Everyone has made some really good points about the different interpretations and personas of the Joker. It's nice to see a civilized conversation on here about differing opinions... Well done everyone..
Yeah, it's nice for now but I bet things get nuts after next week.
Nah, I wasn't implying that it was a good thing.
I don't like Harley personally, never have. She's bugged me since the animated series. It was alright when she was just a moll, a henchwoman, accompanying the Joker on his schemes and such. Once she became his girlfriend though, I dunno. The character annoys me. But I'm in the minority with that one, clearly and Harley has a huge popularity and influence on the Joker as a character that I can't deny.
I'm just saying that one Joker isn't better than any of the others. Like greygoose said, there will never be a definitive version.
Never liked Harley either. Try to avoid the comics she's in. The good thing about new 52, was that the Joker was nuts and without Harley.
Enter your email address to join: