1/6 Hot Toys - MMS382 - Suicide Squad - The Joker (Purple Coat) Collectible Figure

Collector Freaks Forum

Help Support Collector Freaks Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
I mean proof. Cuz I already posted proof in here that he didn't have any back tattoo minus Leto's real back tat.

So it's accurate then because Leto's Joker doesn't have a back tattoo in the film:

W4LDKmf.jpg


Other than the real back tat Leto has:

c272dfece688407c9c9e869c1bf1d587.jpg
 

The chemical dip scene. After Joker rescues Harley, his shirt is damaged from the....acid...I guess, and you can see a tattoo. It could be a dragon...or a Smurf, but there's a tattoo there.

Not the best quality unfortunately, but you can see the ink and the shape matches the merchandise dragon tattoo. It's clearly not a triangle or whatever Leto has on his back in real life. It's more complex.

QLxwwMk.jpg

kyzYJDl.jpg
 
I don't see a damn thing in that pic.

And those two toys are irrelevant since HT and other products don't have that dragon tat. Who knows. Anything is possible at this point with this ******** *** version of The Joker. The derp drew a smile on his face with a sharpie.. so yeah. Damaged. :lol
 
I don't see a damn thing in that pic.

And those two toys are irrelevant since HT and other products don't have that dragon tat. Who knows. Anything is possible at this point with this ******** *** version of The Joker. The derp drew a smile on his face with a sharpie.. so yeah. Damaged. :lol
But the statue is made by DC.
 
W4LDKmf.jpg


At first I thought this photo was irrelevant to a discussion of whether he had the dragon or not, because there is no make up on his back at all.

That was until I expanded the photo. His back looks like it's been painted out badly in Photoshop.

Maybe the dragon was a concept they abandoned during production?

(Opening this on the PC rather than the iPod it's very clear to see it was shopped, as is his face. :lol )
 
MikeyTheKid said:
But the statue is made by DC.

All of the products featuring these characters has to be approved by DC. JC Hong already said DC/WB etc. would not approve a dragon tat for the HT Jokers.

Kuat of Kuat said:
His back looks like it's been painted out badly in Photoshop.

Maybe the dragon was a concept they abandoned during production?

(Opening this on the PC rather than the iPod it's very clear to see it was shopped, as is his face. :lol )

It's not photoshopped. It's a screen grab from this video featuring behind-the-scenes footage:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VMq60wRn5qI

13652154_675152709306175_235148142_n.jpg


It's a very short scene but you can clearly see he has no giant dragon tat on his back. :wave
 
It's a very short scene but you can clearly see he has no giant dragon tat on his back. :wave

Not in that scene. Why would two different companies ( including the one that owns the character) have figures with the same exact dragon tattoo? DC/WB probably changed their mind about him having a back tattoo at some point. Regardless, one of those items was release and is available to purchase before WB changed their minds.

When the films comes out we'll see it during the chemical dip scene...unless they somehow remove it for the bluray. Not sure if they can do that.
 
In the ACE chemical scene you see the dragon tat clearly on his back through the tattered shirt. Saw the movie for the fourth time yesterday. Its there. No way around it.
 
I don't see a damn thing in that pic.

And those two toys are irrelevant since HT and other products don't have that dragon tat. Who knows. Anything is possible at this point with this ******** *** version of The Joker. The derp drew a smile on his face with a sharpie.. so yeah. Damaged. :lol

Not a Leto Joker fan then? :lol
 
No way around it. Clearly. I see it too bro.

Us3mguw.jpg

Next time you watch the movie, try to not wedge those cheeto dust clad thumbs into your eyesockets, like you normaly do, ok "bro"?
And don't gimme that "the movie sucks, so I had to" come back, bro. Someone who calls himself Lolzman has to do better than that.
 
Back
Top