Reaktwon
Super Freak
- Joined
- Aug 27, 2010
- Messages
- 1,218
- Reaction score
- 1
What case?
fibbing about their dollies.
Reaktwon, props to you for debating the same argument in two threads simultaneously.
Personally I am not fussed about deterioration either, it'd spoil the reason why I collect these figures in the first place.
But... even though I've only been collecting for a bit over a year, still newb status, I've done enough reading of these threads to know that folks are having problems with a number of figures doing exactly what most people here are debating you on. Just because the majority may not be posting pics as evidence, I don't really believe that folks are getting their rocks off by fibbing about their dollies.
Hey, I'm not denying that there can be potential problems with these figure, we just need to get our ____ together if that is the case. If we can all expect our figures to rapidly deteriorate, then we need to build a solid case and get on Sideshow and the companies that are releasing defective products. We need to take names and verify the problems with detailed photos, so, that we have enough evidence to make a watertight case for a recall and refund. I don't have any problems with any of mine at the moment, but, if there truly is a problem related to the materials being used, we need to deal with it in the right way.
Hey, I'm not denying that there can be potential problems with these figure, we just need to get our ____ together if that is the case. If we can all expect our figures to rapidly deteriorate, then we need to build a solid case and get on Sideshow and the companies that are releasing defective products. We need to take names and verify the problems with detailed photos, so, that we have enough evidence to make a watertight case for a recall and refund. I don't have any problems with any of mine at the moment, but, if there truly is a problem related to the materials being used, we need to deal with it in the right way.
Your posts did suggest that you didn't think there was as widespread a problem with rubber deterioration as people made out. But if you're saying that putting together a dossier of evidence would be a way to hold companies to account, I'm not sure that's realistic as it seems to me that the chances of a recall or refund on purchases are zero - HT didn't yield over the DX Bats debacle and in that case there was an overwhelming demand from collectors that they make things right.
The problem with doing as you suggest is that rubber-deterioration takes time. By the time a figure starts to break down, the horse has already bolted and even if HT wanted to, they wouldn't be able to re-release figures or replace faulty parts. And they are not at all obliged to provide a refund outside of their nominated replacement period. All warranties work this way to an extent.
Me personally, I hold to the view that any manufacturer worth their salt is driven as much by pride and integrity in their products as they are by good old fashion profit. HT are leading innovators, and innovation comes with risks. I think they recognise the issues with past figures and seek to rectify the issues with how they develop subsequent figures, rather than retrospectively fix things via refunds and re-releases.
Whatever. Some people believe the world is 6000 years old. There's nothing that will change their minds.
Enter your email address to join: