Hot Toys Star Wars Stormtrooper

Collector Freaks Forum

Help Support Collector Freaks Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Anyone who didn't just fall off the bus knows I have a huge love of clone's and they make up over half my 1/6 StarWars, but they really have no place in a stormtrooper conversation.

Unless you're one of those special people waiting on a Boba with a Morrison reveal. :lol
 
I'm betting that HT stormtrooper will have some improvements on SSC close-up in hand, but nothing really noticeable for display on a shelf. Doesn't really warrant the price of an upgrade for me, or having doubles of the same character (I'm no army builder).
They're different alright, don't worry about that. :lol
 
For those still in denial about the presence of clones in the OT, please take the time to actually follow this link. It's the third or fourth time I've posted it in here:

My Tiny Problem With Star Wars Rebels Being Entirely Cloneless - MakingStarWars.net

It features an extract from the *official* Star Wars poster magazine back in the '70s, which clearly refers to them as clones. It also explains the retconning in Rebels, direct from the Lucasfilm folks themselves.
 
A poster is not the movies. I didn't go out to the theaters to watch a poster.

But when the movie doesn't expressly reveal the truth one way or the other, it gives us our best indication of Lucas' intention at the time. It also proves that the concept of clones as Stormtroopers *was* around at the time.
 
The TIE Armored spacesuit? So what does TIE stand for? In 1977 it was Twin Ion Engine.

I gotta say I find using an accidental bump on the head by an extra as proof that the stormtrooper is a Jango clone laughable.

That said, it was my understanding in 1977 that the stormtroopers were supposed to be clones. Various batches -- or at least two because there are only two different stormtrooper voices in STAR WARS.

Somewhere along the line, Lucas changed it to a mixed bag of recruits and clones.
 
Has this been posted yet?
4BB760E7-0922-4AB5-8313-3A234F9BD972-5452-000006F78428D2BB_zpsc981f3b5.jpg
 
I'll still maintain if they were supposed to be clones, or 2 or 3 different batches of clones, how come they are never referred to as Clone Troopers, Clone Army, etc..

Obi-Wan called them Imperial Stormtroopers at the Sandcrawler. I would think he of all people would have used the word Clone if that's what they were. He'd always have known the Clones as Clones. Why make up a different name for them, especially after bring up the Clone Wars.
 
I'll still maintain if they were supposed to be clones, or 2 or 3 different batches of clones, how come they are never referred to as Clone Troopers, Clone Army, etc..

Obi-Wan called them Imperial Stormtroopers at the Sandcrawler. I would think he of all people would have used the word Clone if that's what they were. He'd always have known the Clones as Clones. Why make up a different name for them, especially after bring up the Clone Wars.

Are they not Imperial stormtroopers? So Ben's phrase is correct, from a certain point of view.




You really can't wrap around six movies over 40 years and have everything work out. Lucas tried with the special edition and just made things worse. Back in the day, the idea that they were clones was not really that crucial to the storyline.

And as to why they weren't called Clone Troopers? Because clone trooper is a lame name -- stormtroopers sound much more bad ass (regardless of their shooting skills). STAR WARS was more about tying the Empire to Nazis.
 
I gotta say I find using an accidental bump on the head by an extra as proof that the stormtrooper is a Jango clone laughable.

Sure, the Stormtrooper bump on the head was accidental. Jango's, however, was very much intentional, and tells us what Lucas was thinking (at least by the time of the prequels).


I'll still maintain if they were supposed to be clones, or 2 or 3 different batches of clones, how come they are never referred to as Clone Troopers, Clone Army, etc..

I guess the term "Clone Trooper" only became necessary by the time of the prequels, as Lucas wanted to differentiate the full-clone army of the PT from the partial-clone army of the OT (now the no-clone army).
 
Sure, the Stormtrooper bump on the head was accidental. Jango's, however, was very much intentional, and tells us what Lucas was thinking (at least by the time of the prequels).

It's that prequel thinking.

I guess the term "Clone Trooper" only became necessary by the time of the prequels, as Lucas wanted to differentiate the full-clone army of the PT from the partial-clone army of the OT (now the no-clone army).

That, and the fact of Ben's famous "Clone Wars" reference that basically forced George's hand.



I'm really not sure why people care one way or the other. Clone or recruits? Who cares, and what's the difference? There's so much inconsistency in STAR WARS that you can almost have it your own way.

One thing though, regular people signing up to be Stormtroopers are worse than clones breed to commit atrocities.
 
So $199 for one and 2 for $399 from Sideshow, what is the point of a 2 pack when they cost $200 each anyway?

Also cannot ship to Australia, yet Han and Chewie can? What is going on with Sideshow's shipping service? I just don't understand it!
 
For those still in denial about the presence of clones in the OT, please take the time to actually follow this link. It's the third or fourth time I've posted it in here:

My Tiny Problem With Star Wars Rebels Being Entirely Cloneless - MakingStarWars.net

It features an extract from the *official* Star Wars poster magazine back in the '70s, which clearly refers to them as clones. It also explains the retconning in Rebels, direct from the Lucasfilm folks themselves.

"Official":lol

Let's just say Galaxy Publications Ltd., publisher of said "official" confirmation of clones, had a "broad variety" of mags back then. Hey, it was the 70's.
 
$(KGrHqZ,!joE6+2HsDZZBOz-d9np)w~~60_35.JPG

I guess we can write Stormtroopers are part Clones on this, then we won't have a leg to stand on anymore, you know...cause it's official.
 
"Official":lol

Let's just say Galaxy Publications Ltd., publisher of said "official" confirmation of clones, had a "broad variety" of mags back then. Hey, it was the 70's.

And Lucas held a tight rein over any material that was published: magazines, comics, the works. It wouldn't have seen print without Lucasfilm approval - and Lucasfilm was likely the source of most of the information in the poster mag.

Oh, and if TK-421 ain't a clone name, at the very least it's a human stripped of his individuality!
 
Last edited:
Back
Top