Hot Toys- Terminator 2: Sarah Connor full spec and pics

Collector Freaks Forum

Help Support Collector Freaks Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
He's gonna do a sequel to Kindergarten cop, where he's a prof at some university but this time with a tuma!
 
The fact is he was a different guy in all 3 films whether they looked the same or not. Even if you want to call them clones he did not have the memories of the previous terminators and thus was a new individual. That is why I would buy Terminators from all 3 films and display them togethor. 3 different guys. :D
 
I'd beg to differ. Clint had the "Arnold" roles of his time. The No Name trilogy or Dirty Harry series are perfect examples. I'll be interested to see what roles a post-governor Arnold seeks out.
I would say that Arnold had the equivalent of "Eastwood" roles in his time. ;)

There is no disputing who is the better actor (Eastwood) or who is the better action star (Arnold). But if you want to compare them based on who is more bad-ass, Eastwood did it far better in my opinion, and did far more of it. Arnold started turning to action-comedies and playing the role of purely good guys in his later works. Eastwood kept coming back to the morally ambivalent anti-hero. And probably because of his acting, it felt a lot more genuine. Arnold was really at his best when he was just playing a mindless, relatively emotion-less soldier of one kind or another (well, excluding the emotion of anger). Eastwood had deep issues and flaws buried under the surface, that somehow made him even more bad-ass when he channeled them into his fury.
 
Arnie wins due to the amount of amazing quotes he has

"Remember Sully when I said i'd kill you last....I lied"
 
I would say that Arnold had the equivalent of "Eastwood" roles in his time. ;)

There is no disputing who is the better actor (Eastwood) or who is the better action star (Arnold). But if you want to compare them based on who is more bad-ass, Eastwood did it far better in my opinion, and did far more of it. Arnold started turning to action-comedies and playing the role of purely good guys in his later works. Eastwood kept coming back to the morally ambivalent anti-hero. And probably because of his acting, it felt a lot more genuine. Arnold was really at his best when he was just playing a mindless, relatively emotion-less soldier of one kind or another (well, excluding the emotion of anger). Eastwood had deep issues and flaws buried under the surface, that somehow made him even more bad-ass when he channeled them into his fury.

Eastwood's orangutan movies, etc, more than compare to Arnold's comedy crap (save that Eastwood does it better :lol). I think End of Days and Collateral Damage are looks into what Arnie will be doing in the future. Those scream Eastwood. Arnie is the Eastwood of his time in much the same way Eastwood was the Heston of his.
 
EOD was amazing, one of my favorites!!!! :rock

"Oh, you think you're bad, huh? You're a _______ choir boy compared to me! A CHOIR BOY!"
 
EOD was amazing, one of my favorites!!!! :rock

"Oh, you think you're bad, huh? You're a _______ choir boy compared to me! A CHOIR BOY!"

I was brought up not to speak about the value of things, maybe Jericho should have been brought up not to speak about how bad ass he his. Less is more....
 
This is a good watch .............

<object width="480" height="385"><param name="movie" value="https://www.youtube.com/v/lMwiIzv-VFA&hl=en_US&fs=1&"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="https://www.youtube.com/v/lMwiIzv-VFA&hl=en_US&fs=1&" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="480" height="385"></embed></object>

Superb find!

:rotfl @ 1:31.
 
Back
Top