ronri
Super Freak
- Joined
- Sep 15, 2012
- Messages
- 2,524
- Reaction score
- 27
Honestly I love Snake, but my appreciation for villains is what swayed me over to love Big Boss even more (possibly being my favorite protagonist in MGS at all). Not because "erm mah gerd, Big Boss>Solid Snake", but because I truly came to appreciate his role as the tragic villain, the hero that fell in light of trying to achieve something beyond what his mentor had wanted. I do like the interesting contrast between the two: Snake is more willing to kill yet he would rather live a normal life, whereas Big Boss prefers sparing people yet he's a character that slowly comes to accept the role of a soldier in a never-ending battle.Raiden being the main guy in MGS2 was the best thing to even happen to Solid Snake. From Metal Gear, Metal Gear 2, And even MGS he portrays us, the player. Who has no clue what is going on. So he is constantly being down talked and treated like an idiot by both his own team who half the time treat him like an expendable pawn and by his foes who also equally treat him like an idiot. In MGS2 because we wernt snake it give him the chance to actually be the one in-the-know. And then Raiden was given the clueless boots.
I think in MGS1 he said " the reality doesnt live up to the legend ". And i think this is true, because Meryl was looking at him from the outside. Like we were in MGS2. But for the most time when you actually play as him everybody you meet calls you an idiot and at the end of every game you find out you did something counter-productive.
Which is why pretty much a lot of people jumped on to Big Bosses wagon. And im not a mindless follower, but i do also prefer Big Boss. Not for actor, or game stand point. But from an overall significance in story standpoint.
I do hate how people have come to jump on the Big Boss bandwagon, but at the same time, it makes me hate the nostalgic fans even more when they brandish Solid Snake around as the be-all-end-all of Metal Gear and how MGS1 is the only good game. It's become this moronic circle-jerk that ends up making the fans look ridiculously stupid on both sides.
I also liked Raiden's role in MGS2, never hated him one bit. He worked as an audience-surrogate, and it managed to put Solid Snake into a great position as a mentor-like figure for him, in which some of his best lines actually come from MGS2. In turn, I also liked his developments in MGS4 and MGR enough to really like him as a character. Now despite some folks claiming him to simply being a Gray Fox-wannabe (seriously? the nostalgia-fanwank for MGS1 is ridiculous sometimes), I always felt his character developed rather uniquely in comparison to Snake and Big Boss (and yes even Gray Fox) enough to stand on its own. The guy wanted to live normally, yet he's pushed in a position (PTSD as a child soldier and becoming a cyborg) where being an outcast is inevitable, forcing him to adopt a lifestyle he's more suited to. In the end, it's revealed that not only does he not mind killing, he actually ENJOYS it. I find that the main difference between Fox and Raiden's roles/back-story is the fact that Fox had already been living out his life as a well-respected and dedicated soldier under Big Boss's wing and his turn as a cyborg is more of a dark/ghostly reflection of his former self, whereas Raiden's case was more similar to child abuse where he's turned into an actual killing machine because of his twisted "father" (Solidus), in which case becoming a cyborg is actually what allowed him to survive and make something productive out of the harsh life he's been living (literally giving him new meaning in his tortured life in contrast to Fox's descent). His fate in becoming a fugitive who has tempered his murderous streak and is fighting for a greater cause is pretty appropriate in this regard.