i dont drink or smoke,
does that make me a loser? i was talking specifically about booze and smokes, only, this whole time ive been saying, those two habits can be costly, I don't have them so i can spend on some figures,
of course, people would say that going to clubs is cool and buying toys is nerdy and stupid. but even if i didnt buy toys i would still not drink or smoke, i have nothing against people that do. i just never found joy in them.
im not saying one is better than the other either, the only difference is that the figures can be sold later, the booze/smokes can damage the body, that's all really, if people enjoy drinking then that's okay,
I just don't need alcohol to have a good time, I hate Hate being drunk, hangovers, drinking is just awful to me,
One can rationalize paying thousands each year on dollies 'til the cows come home, but the reality is that just because a person blows thousands on smokes, booze, women and song, it doesn't make it OK to substitute those costly habits with one of a different kind. And we are referencing the cost issue here, not what's a "better" or "worse" vice. They can both cause severe financial problems.
If a person want to keep sinking thousands on cool-looking dollies like there's no tomorrow, that's his/her business, but one ought not pretend that it's acceptable due to the fact that he/she doesn't smoke or drink like that other guy. That other guy might throw a small fortune at Camels and Old Forester but he doesn't give a rat's behind about a thousand-dollar T-800 bust. 'Sauce for the goose.'
Clearly, neither in excess is any good.
Last edited: