InArt: The Lord of the Rings - Frodo and Sam

Collector Freaks Forum

Help Support Collector Freaks Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Both are still wearing their ‘coats’ at the end of Fellowship, as they do in most major scenes of that movie.

They leave Amon Hen with them, then ditch them in TTT after crossing Emyn Muil, before being captured by Faramir.
wp-1658511691197.jpg


Since all three movies were filmed together and costume test images were all available before the first movie released, I wouldn’t take an image used to promote FOTR as being indicative of a look primarily associated with that movie alone.

Although every character adds layers or removes items of clothing depending on the climate of the region they’re traversing, the image of Frodo and Sam both without their jackets/coats, dirtied, and wearing the Elven cloaks is far more associable with The Two Towers and Return of The King than FOTR.
In fact, I don’t believe there’s a single scene of them jacketless with the Elven cloak in FOTR- although I’m always happy to be reminded of any moment in LOTR.

TLDR: No, I’m right. :giggle:
Yeah you love being right.

Now that you mention it, I can see that they’re wearing them in the promo image they used, so yes, they should bring those traveling coats as well (in addition to the Shire cloaks).

I just hope WēTā/INART includes everything relevant that appears in Fellowship of the Ring (2001).
 
Last edited:
Yeah you love being right.
Or do I dislike other people being wrong…

So far, hasn’t every InArt LOTR figure been missing something preventing the from being an all encompassing FOTR representation?

Unless I’m confused with The Hobbit, Gandalf wears two different cloaks; one hooded and one without a hood, Aragon should have come with his Ranger cloak as standard, and Legolas is missing his Mirkwood weaponry.

So far, InArt aren’t really setting a precedent for covering every look from the movie with a single figure.
 
Or do I dislike other people being wrong…

So far, hasn’t every InArt LOTR figure been missing something preventing the from being an all encompassing FOTR representation?

Unless I’m confused with The Hobbit, Gandalf wears two different cloaks; one hooded and one without a hood, Aragon should have come with his Ranger cloak as standard, and Legolas is missing his Mirkwood weaponry.

So far, InArt aren’t really setting a precedent for covering every look from the movie with a single
You’re not wrong. Ultimately they do leave a bit to be desired with what they give us for the prices. Legolas not having the Mirkwood bow was egregious…
 
Back
Top