Premium Format Iron Man Mark 42 1/4 Maquette by Sideshow Collectibles & Legacy Effects

[desisandy]

Hmmmm interesting we had a Terminator day, This must. IRonman day.wooooo.

 

[nemenforcer]

Where did all those pics come from. Did ss leak them or did someone hack their system

 

[RobertoBagg10]

Where did all those pics come from. Did ss leak them or did someone hack their system

I hacked into JARVIS!!!

 

[Snadinator]

It's completely relevant. Look at the pose, he has a closed fist - so that means the gun is missing or he is giving a fist pump. Which is it?

Again he doesn't have it retracted at all times so it is irrelevant. Nevertheless, way to pick one facet to argue. XM doesn't have an IP, their Iron Man statue doesn't light up, their RDJ likeness is not very good and it costs $200 more.

like I said. XM makes nice stuff. I am interested in magneto, antman and thanos... but ironman is owned by ssc and legacy

 

[Collectorcol]

Where did all those pics come from. Did ss leak them or did someone hack their system

Blog...

 

[Collectorcol]

Two MK III threads and no MK VII or II?

 

[Collectorcol]

It's ok, DHAVAL is on the case

 

[Y4NK33 PL4N3T]

Again he doesn't have it retracted at all times so it is irrelevant. Nevertheless, way to pick one facet to argue. XM doesn't have an IP, their Iron Man statue doesn't light up, their RDJ likeness is not very good and it costs $200 more.

like I said. XM makes nice stuff. I am interested in magneto, antman and thanos... but ironman is owned by ssc and legacy

Again, look at the pose and the scene they chose to portray - the mini gun is missing

Nevertheless, way to omit one facet so you can keep saying how 'film accurate' SSC always is. How accurate is this Sideshow release:

And the XM Mk VII has not been previewed yet so nobody knows if it lights up, plus this RDJ likeness is equally as terrible if not worse than their Mk 42.

 

[Snadinator]

Mkiii base is pretty bad ass. Wonder if an iron minger maquette woild be doable. Would be expensive as hell.

 

[franpincho]

Man, that MKVII looks boss


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[Snadinator]

Again, look at the pose and the scene they chose to portray - the mini gun is missing

Nevertheless, way to omit one facet so you can keep saying how 'film accurate' SSC always is. How accurate is this Sideshow release:

And the XM Mk VII has not been previewed yet so nobody knows if it lights up, plus this RDJ likeness is equally as terrible if not worse than their Mk 42.

I don't see that scene as being identical to IP statue at all. His leg isn't up. The base doesn't jive with that scene either. The IP statue is it's own pose.

the likeness on the ssc one is much closer. Come on. We also know their xvii has no light up and it still costs 50% more and that is before the exorbitant shipping.

I still say when it comes to iron man, the choice is very easy.

 

[Y4NK33 PL4N3T]

I don't see that scene as being identical to IP statue at all. His leg isn't up. The base doesn't jive with that scene either. The IP statue is it's own pose.

the likeness on the ssc one is much closer. Come on. We also know their xvii has no light up and it still costs 50% more and that is before the exorbitant shipping.

I still say when it comes to iron man, the choice is very easy.

If the mini gun on the forearm is not supposed to be there then why would he have his arm up? Forget the legs and base, the gun is missing.

And you're speculating about a statue that hasn't been revealed which means nothing comparatively.

Also, how film accurate is an upside down arc reactor? I noticed you ignored that completely.

 

[tommyh84]

This is gonna be expensive

 

[DHAVAL]

this & War machine 2 have the exact same pose

 

[Snadinator]

If the mini gun on the forearm is not supposed to be there then why would he have his arm up? Forget the legs and base, the gun is missing.

And you're speculating about a statue that hasn't been revealed which means nothing comparatively.

Also, how film accurate is an upside down arc reactor? I noticed you ignored that completely.

I am not ignoring it... Like IP you are comparing SSC products to non existant XM ones. Compare mark 42 or mkvii.

 

[Y4NK33 PL4N3T]

I am not ignoring it... Like IP you are comparing SSC products to non existant XM ones. Compare mark 42 or mkvii.

I'm comparing your 'film accuracy' remarks to a recent SSC Iron Man Mk 6 release and IP pre order that are not film accurate, which you conveniently ignore.

 

[Snadinator]

Film accuracy as compared to the competition. Compare apples to apples here.

And ya, again the cost and lack of light up, and weaker likeness on the xm xvii make it less desirable.

edit... forgot the yellow on the xm xvii is not right either.

 

[Tavegg]

So mk 2,3, and 7 will fill my urges. How many people have the original mark 7 up for sale already?

Thanks for posting Andy

 

[Y4NK33 PL4N3T]

Film accuracy as compared to the competition. Compare apples to apples here.

What's the competition on the Mark VI? There was none. You just cannot admit when they **** up, it's okay. Moving on.

 

[DHAVAL]

So mk 2,3, and 7 will fill my urges. How many people have the original mark 7 up for sale already?

Thanks for posting Andy

original Mark 7?? which one ?? & if u r talking abt Mark 6 i dont think anyone will sell it. if whole Armour line is coming that will be a foolish thing to dO