Here's how I feel; this is Khan:
This is ONLY khan. Or Javier Bardem. What if Cumberbatch isn't the villian, but a henchmen. Would be brilliant and throw us all off the scent?
I don't think cumberbatch is khan, he could be but I don't get why would he use a name like john harrison if that's not his real name, from the trailers i'm gathering they knew who cumberbatchs character was before his return. I'm guessing alot of this is just a misinformation campaign.
a very interesting read; not sure what it all means, anymore!
https://www.trekbbs.com/showthread.php?t=196981
If that's true he's really mad about what Scotty did to his dog.
I'm trying to remember if Abrams hid the identity and name Nero during the initial marketing of Star Trek.
I play John Harrison who’s a terrorist and an extraordinary character in his own right. He’s somebody who is not your two-dimensional cookie cutter villain. He’s got an extraordinary purpose, and I hope that at one point or other in the film you might even sympathize with the reasons he’s doing what he’s doing — not necessarily the means and the destruction he causes. But it was a great ride, not just because he’s the bad guy and the antagonist but also because he has a purpose and it’s hard not to see his point of view at certain points.
He has extraordinary physical powers, but also mental powers. He can sow an idea, which is as powerful as gunshots or close-hand combat, which he’s masterful in. He tears into the fabric of both the world and the Enterprise family, and he leaves behind him a trail of devastation. It’s quite exciting to watch.
Enter your email address to join: