Batffeck5.0
Super Freak
- Joined
- Mar 6, 2016
- Messages
- 708
- Reaction score
- 593
Hot toys Batmobile on display!!!
HT wins on the paint job definitely. The foot plates attach differently, which is more accurate?
Jazz vs hot toys. I think I’m go with the cheaper option. It looks great on display IMO
I’m sticking to Jazz inc for my 1/6 vehicle needs because especially after that delorean fiasco I don’t need that kind of QC drama with no formal response from HT. Too expensive for companies to put stuff out like that and not be accountable. I know for one Jazz stands behind their product if there’s ever an issue.
Yeah, my Jazzinc version is slated to ship this September. I seriously doubt that HT will even have one available to order by the time I have mine on display.What makes you guys so sure Hot Toys is going to deliver the Batman Batmobile? It’s displayed next to the BvS Batmobile which to date has not been put up for order.
Yeah the flatter finish might be more accurate to the actual car, but in 1/6 it kinda comes across a bit boring and plasticky. So I think HT chose the better approach.I really like the metallic finish they're able to get on it over what Jazz did but I don't think Hot Toys will actually produce this so bit of a mute point all around.
I don’t see how you can say HT wins on the paint job.HT wins on the paint job definitely. The foot plates attach differently, which is more accurate?
Kinda surprised that undercarriage area was overlooked all this time. I've looked at this a lot of times and accuracy stuff was brought to Joost's attention during the whole process by the community. I always thought something was off but couldn't pinpoint it. Somehow the side profile felt chunky and I just brushed it off as how the car was photographed.
I’d be interested to hear what, if anything, @JazzInc has to say about it. I mean, it’s one thing to trot out a vehicle that may or may not function, but it’s another thing entirely to be engineer something that actually works in hand. I’m not saying the difference in the running board area is purely due to engineering needs, but again, I’d like to hear Joost’s take on it.Actually really annoyed now. Already paid off mine but didn't know it was that inaccurate.. just assumed it was as accurate as possible
Wow, HT posts one picture of theirs with poor lighting but from an admittedly optimal angle and suddenly the Jazzinc version is inaccurate? I think some people need to chill.Actually really annoyed now. Already paid off mine but didn't know it was that inaccurate.. just assumed it was as accurate as possible
In all fairness, it is different from the pictures of the actual vehicle. That said, it wasn’t like it was completely developed in a vacuum - there were thousands of people looking at it and WB even approved it. Everyone here had an opportunity to participate, so if there is an issue that wasn’t caught, we can all look no further than the mirror to see who missed it.Wow, HT posts one picture of theirs with poor lighting but from an admittedly optimal angle and suddenly the Jazzinc version is inaccurate? I think some people need to chill.
Wow, HT posts one picture of theirs with poor lighting but from an admittedly optimal angle and suddenly the Jazzinc version is inaccurate? I think some people need to chill.
I feel like Hot Toys has the better metallic paintjob and the weathering looks more realistic throughout. Looks like actual metal that was hammered and welded together. I think Jazz's version leans more on the plastic finish side.I don’t see how you can say HT wins on the paint job.
Not trying to dunk on Jazz version but it is inaccurate with the undercarriage from what we can see. Even the 1/35 scale Bandai model kit had the undercarriage design that Hot Toys has.Wow, HT posts one picture of theirs with poor lighting but from an admittedly optimal angle and suddenly the Jazzinc version is inaccurate? I think some people need to chill.
Enter your email address to join: