Agreed. I believe this will fall anywhere between $575 to $650. And at that point, you might as well spend the extra $250 and get the Hot Toys version. Just my opinion though. Interested to see how much this is.
Yeah posing, but more of an extended session of posing
Edit: You mean the Bandai figure? Shouldn't even be called a diecast figure. It's like 5% diecast or something
Sorry dude. I tried to understand that, & think I kinda got some of it, but confused on the other stuff I get the part about the Tony Stark's shins breaking, but don't really understand the "twice the MkXLIII width side to side" part. No need to explain it further to me though. I'm not the smartest guy, so it might go over my head
From what I think I understand, it seems to me like you're saying the Hulkbuster with the MkXLIII inside, is a flawed concept overall, & not specific to the KA figure? I thought when you said the KA was off scale, that you meant off scale to the movie version. Like the MXLIII was smaller in scale in the movie or something. KA, HT, & Concept, all seem proportionately similar to me in the pics below.
Looking at the direct comparison, the HT really does have those nice little extra details. I think I read getting the finer details in the sculpt might be more of a problem for diecast. I guess that's what turns some peeps off. Plus maybe easier to paint chip & things like that. But those don't really deter me from wanting it.
I really think if it was 1/6 vs 1/6, it would have been way more interesting to compare the 2. Plus, I think KA could have kept it in a similar price as the HT, & still be diecast.
Which brings me to how much of this is actually diecast? That is the main draw for me, that even tickles my attention away from the HT Hulkbuster. I don't want no lame 30% diecast nonsense. At the low end, I'd want at least around 70%. I might go banana's if it's 100% diecast
30℅ close to what HT puts in their "diecast" figures and the Kool Aid drinkers proudly proclaim their love for and buy.
The hilarious part about this is most of the people talking about diecast's importance are the people considering buying this KING ARTS figure. Not the ones who are the "HT Kool Aid" drinkers as you like to call them.
So King Arts was Play Imaginitive?? Don't get excited yet folks- may be another dream...
So King Arts was Play Imaginitive?? Don't get excited yet folks- may be another dream...
Unless you wanted to lube them ha ... I'll let Motuxmen explain when he's around. He's very knowledgable and thorough.
I have a diecast Iron Patriot and they are said to be 40% diecast. Don't really see why it would need any more.
Could be. It looks nice, but I feel the ratio of money spent, to figure coolness, isn't satisfactory to me. I think the way I feel about the SHF is how some might feel about the KA.While Bandai highlighted some of the exterior metal parts, there could be more internal metal for joints and internal structure.
I understand that better. Cheers.As for my description of the torso and the size. Lol yea not the best worded. Let's try this. The Hb should be wide enough to fit two full mark 43 in it side by side in the torso (not the legs of the HB suit, just how wide the torso is). Think of it like a mcclearen f1. Instead of two front seats it has one center drive seat with the extra space of the second seat split up half and half on the two sides. In the photo the two boxes areas of the torso equal 1/2 of a mk43. That better?
Educational. Okay, maybe not 100% (it's not anyway), but I disagree about it being a waste if over 50%. I think at least 70% would still be cool.Yeah a 100% diecast figure is not a good idea .....
Theory. Play Imaginative.why did HT venture into the diecast method in the 1st place?
Enter your email address to join: