Legalizing Drugs On The Horizon

Collector Freaks Forum

Help Support Collector Freaks Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Status
Not open for further replies.
Thats also one thing I don't understand about the argument for the legalization of drugs.

"Hello. I am a drug dealer. I derive the bulk of my income from the sale of dope."

*congress passes legalization bill*

"Oh snap. There goes my money. hmmmmm... well I guess its time for me to find a real job. I sure hope McDonalds is hiring"

*crime goes down 60%*

:rolleyes:

Ween's quote also highlights one of the problems with drug addiction (be it psychological or physical): Its always someone else's problems and the bad stuff will never happen to them.
 
I know pix voted for Obama but by his recent statements i woulda thought he'd voted Bush Or McCain!:lol :monkey2
 
Thanks for the spelling correction. :lol

Even though you never were caught or had sympathetic bosses/whoever doesn't mean the risk wasn't still there for you nor for for anyone else who is currently using it.

My greatest risk would be a $100 fine if I chose to smoke some weed and happened to get caught. That would hardly quality as "putting my personal and professional life in jeopardy". I've been around longer than you, and I've never known smoking weed to ever cause a single problem to anybody I know. I can't say the same about alcohol, and that is legal. Just because you may have had ill experiences with it, does not mean everyone will. Which leads us to you comment below.

"I have driven a car my whole life and never been in an accident" does not logically translate to "I will never be in an accident and neither will anyone else".

I would never make a comment like that in regards to anything. But I'm in much greater jeopardy of injuring myself and others by driving to work everyday than by smoking weed a couple of times.

Your attitude seems to be that weed will inherently cause problems eventually, which is false. You have to realize that many people are not going to have any problems by smoking weed. Just like many people drink alcohol in moderation without any negative side effects, and the great majority of people driving to work each day don't get into an accidents.

Weed can be instrumental in a persons downfall, that is true, but the same can be said about practically everything. Things like religion, driving and toy collecting can be abused, that does not mean they should be outlawed.
 
Your attitude seems to be that weed will inherently cause problems eventually, which is false. You have to realize that many people are not going to have any problems by smoking weed.


^^^^ yes!!! HELL YES!! GOD DAMNIT, it's about time someone said it.


:lecture:lecture:clap:clap:clap:clap:lecture :winner:bow
 
Your attitude seems to be that weed will inherently cause problems eventually, which is false. You have to realize that many people are not going to have any problems by smoking weed. Just like many people drink alcohol in moderation without any negative side effects, and the great majority of people driving to work each day don't get into an accidents.

Weed can be instrumental in a persons downfall, that is true, but the same can be said about practically everything. Things like religion, driving and toy collecting can be abused, that does not mean they should be outlawed.
I think your argument would be stronger if you said "without major problems" instead of "without any problems".

My principal objection to smoking marijuana is that it is shown to contribute to risks of lung cancer (as, obviously, smoking tobacco cigarettes do as well).

I don't see this as a huge reason for it not to be legalized (since cigarettes and alcohol are legal and have been shown to be carcinogenic), but potential long-term health problems related to its use are still a problem.
 
object>
 
Thank you for the condolences. Not trying to be disrespectful but that's about all I can agree on. This is my opinion and mine only. I think to many parents try the softer gentler way of parenting. I go to stores, restaurants and see kids running rough shod through the establishment. Way to often I see young kids actually slap at their parents. Most of the time all you see the parent do is just shrug it off, say "oh well, kids will be kids".

I don't understand Celtics views with his parents. I don't find it acceptable that he TELLS parents that if he feels like it he is going to smoke, drink whatever he tells them, especially if they help him with his hobby. I think your son is pretty young right now, I look forward to updates on how accepting you are going to be with him as he gets more rambuntious as we boys do.

You say you're going to let your son make his own mistakes? Are you going to let him touch a hot stove? Cross a street without looking? Of course not. So why would you let him do stuff like smoking or drinking just because you had a long talk about it. My kids are to old now for spankings (yes, I believe in it)but will not hesitate to take phones, IPODs, outings or whatever it takes to get my point across. I have posted it before but will again. I have 2 daughters 16 and 14 and 2 step-daughters 15 and 12. I am firm with them, but they adore me and I them. I hope your parenting works out for you, but I know what worked for me.

As far as being hypocritical, you're 100 % correct. I parent by "do as I say not as I do". If your son comes up to you at the age of 11 and says he wants to have sex with the 16 yr. old next door, are you going to think "well, I have sex and I'd be a hypocrite to tell him he can't? If so then I may as well not respond anymore, because our parental methods are polar opposites.

Wow, over-generalizing, much?

Parenting styles differ, but nothing in my post (or that book), or in Celtic's posts, says that kids should never be punished or disciplined. Punishing also differs from parent to parent. I was never hit or spanked by my parents (oh wait - one time my mom slapped my hand, but she felt bad about it and apologized later), but they had other, stronger (at least in my case), forms of punishment... like embarrassment :lol Our parenting philosophy: let them make their mistakes - sometimes the outcome of making that mistake is punishment enough and they will learn all they need to from that. Sometimes you have to step in and punish them a little bit more, and *that's* what they will learn from.

But in the end, they're still gonna make that mistake no matter what you do or do not do - so all I'm saying is that being overprotective and overbearing and, frankly, disrespectful (making them drive cars with GPS reporting, telling kids they'll get kicked out of the house for doing drugs/alcohol even once, etc etc) can OFTENTIMES (not always) be less beneficial than being a little more lenient and understanding. Especially with the kicking out thing - if it comes to that, does any parent really want to kick their kid out? And if they don't follow through when the forbidden thing inevitably happens, then they'll know their parents are full of empty threats ('if that's a lie, what ELSE is a lie?') - it's a lose-lose situation when it comes to teenagers and ultimatums, unless you are fully prepared to follow through without backing down... which then leads to regrets and all of that horrible cycle that has put so many people in therapy over the years (be it the therapy of drinking too much, or the therapy of visiting a psychiatrist, or the many other forms of therapy in which the human race participates)!

In all of your instances (hot stove, sex, etc) I will do the same things as I will with alcohol/drugs - I will educate him... "Hey, don't touch that!! It's hot and will burn you!"... but that's not necessarily going to stop him from touching a hot stove in the future if he really wants to. And after that he'll never touch it again! Kids *will* always be kids (especially boys - yes, I know what I'm in for!) and parents have to turn their backs at some point, after teaching them as best they can about life. How else are they gonna learn anything for themselves? I was raised that way, as well as with a great respect for privacy... our doors were ALWAYS open (no closed doors in our house - by CHOICE not by some silly parental law), because our parents trusted us to respect their privacy and not bust in, and we trusted them to do the same.

Here's an anecdote from my own life that, ironically, while not an oven, has to do with something hot (I was about 5 at the time and keep in mind this was the very early 80s and they did weird stuff like put hot t-shirt presses up by the cash registers then :lol ... in other words, before the rampant suing of companies for things that were not their fault got way out of hand):

Mom (sees me reaching for the t-shirt press, grabs my hands): "Don't touch that, it's really hot and it'll burn your skin right off!!"
Me (not knowing what 'being burned' really meant): "Okay."

5 minutes later we return to the cash register area to pay for my mom's purchases... meanwhile, I am still fascinated with the t-shirt press, and I don't really believe that it could be THAT hot... so I touch it very lightly with my thumb... it's THAT hot and I have a burned thumb with a huge bubbly blister for the next week... which also fascinated me when it burst one day :sick

Is my mom a bad mom because of that? Not at all! Was the employee a bad employee because of that? Not at all - I was shorter than the counter and she couldn't see me inching up - plus she was doing her job ringing up a sale. Am I a bad kid because of that - maybe a little, but that's what kids do! Did my mom sue the store? No because she knew it was my fault not the store's. Did my mom yell and scream and spank me? No, believe me I learned my lesson without any yelling or punishment of any kind!!

Now, for another anecdote, holding hands and looking both ways while crossing the street is a MUST for kids under a certain age. Again, to avoid the screaming fits if your toddler doesn't want to hold your hand, educate! Obviously on this one you're not gonna let them make their own mistakes, but you can avoid a lot of headaches and fights by educating them on WHY they need to hold your hand, rather than just saying "because I say so" - which really just INVITES them to argue and throw tantrums! (also, in my experiences, simply adding the word 'please' works wonders, especially on polite toddlers who know how to say please and thank you... I may not have a grown child of my own yet, but I've done my part to help raise more than 6 different kids, from nannying to older-sistering.)

But you know what, after I grew out of the age that my mom was making (disguised as requesting) me hold hands when crossing the street, she also forbade me to ride my bike in the street until I was 10 years old. I understood the rule, and I understood WHY she had the rule, but I didn't always follow it to a T and she knew it (parents aren't dumb)... on any given day you could see me zigzagging in and out of the driveways just so I could 'dare' to ride in the street when my parents weren't looking, even if only for a second! I never put myself in danger, I always looked both ways and had the utmost respect for automobiles because of the way I was educated - and my parents knew this so let me get away with that little discretion without punishment or even bringing it up (at the time I thought I was totally getting away with it :lol).

You can compare that anecdote (something that can be super dangerous if done incorrectly - ie: riding your bike in the street) to drug and alcohol use in a responsible teenager who has been educated well. Just because they drink (or smoke pot) occasionally, doesn't make them irresponsible. Now, binge drinking and getting so wasted you forget what you did all night is a different story... my parent's trusted me not to do either, and if I ever had there would have been hell to pay and I would have learned from that mistake. But I was taught well and knew, even as a teenager, that it would be dumb and dangerous to do those things. Seeing my idiot friends do them was enough for me! Coming home slightly wasted was never enough for punishment in our household (cause for embarrassment and family stories, yes!)... but not coming home at all, or going to school wasted was a different story - I honestly have no idea what my parents would have done in those cases because, thanks to their awesome and respectful parenting, it never happened to me or any of my siblings.

I strongly believe that a lot of things these days are too 'baby proofed' to really teach kids lessons. Thus they get out on their own at 18 and go completely NUTS because they were sheltered and lived under so many arbitrary "because I said so" rules for so long. For instance, date rape, binge drinking and self-cutting are MAJOR problems in colleges these days - much more so than in even my college years, which weren't THAT long ago (I graduated in 2000). The book I cited goes more into the causes of that (overbearing 'hothouse' parenting, relationships not based on mutual respect) and doesn't ever say not to punish your kids! That would just be silly.

(Wow, long post! Thank goodness Dax now enjoys long afternoon naps :))
 
Last edited:
Your Mom didn't sue the store because it was the 80's. If it were today, you would now own that store.:lol:lol:lol

Ha! I don't know, my family is just not the 'sue sue sue' type, even if it was today. Heck, we don't even complain at Taco Bell when they get our order slightly wrong (those people are only making $6 an hour, and it's probably really hard to hear through that headset... and to err is human), and I don't think I have EVER used the horn in my car :lol But on the other hand, people don't just walk all over me either... I think people like to be treated respectfully and will treat you respectfully in return... if I go in automatically being a ^^^^, I'll get a loogie in my hamburger for sure! And those few people who don't give a crap and don't treat you respectfully in return are not worth my time.
 
Last edited:
Ha! I don't know, my family is just not the 'sue sue sue' type, even if it was today. Heck, we don't even complain at Taco Bell when they get our order slightly wrong (those people are only making $6 an hour, and it's probably really hard to hear through that headset... and to err is human), and I don't think I have EVER used the horn in my car :lol But on the other hand, people don't just walk all over me either... I think people like to be treated respectfully and will treat you respectfully in return... if I go in automatically being a ^^^^, I'll get a loogie in my hamburger for sure! And those few people who don't give a crap and don't treat you respectfully in return are not worth my time - if I let someone cut me off with a smile and wave, and then later they don't return the favor, I just go about driving - it takes longer to honk and flip them off than to just forget about it.
Well GOOD FOR YOU!!!!!!!!!
christian_bale_american_psycho.jpg
 
Thats also one thing I don't understand about the argument for the legalization of drugs.

"Hello. I am a drug dealer. I derive the bulk of my income from the sale of dope."

*congress passes legalization bill*

"Oh snap. There goes my money. hmmmmm... well I guess its time for me to find a real job. I sure hope McDonalds is hiring"

*crime goes down 60%*

:rolleyes:

Ween's quote also highlights one of the problems with drug addiction (be it psychological or physical): Its always someone else's problems and the bad stuff will never happen to them.

Many drug dealers are only in the industry due to the ease of profits and indeed, would have more legit jobs otherwise. Not everyone is a street level dealer (see : any college/university in the country). Plus, more jobs producing/distributing/marketing open up now if it's legal.

In addition, it's also a huge stream of money to criminal organizations that would be cut off, and while yes, they would do other crimes...they already do them now, so you'd at least be cutting off SOME funding.

You'd also be saving money by not paying, what is it, $40kish a year per perhson to house an incredible amount of inmates in the awful US jail system, which really just screws people over and makes them more likely to become career criminals upon their exit from it.

I mean honestly, how many criminal organizations/criminals do you see bootlegging alcohol now? Not too many!
 
By the way, the word you were looking for was jeopardy.

...That would hardly quality as "putting my personal and professional life in jeopardy".

I would never make a comment like that in regards to anything. But I'm in much greater jeopardy of injuring myself and others by driving to work everyday than by smoking weed a couple of times.

For someone who used to smoke weed you sure are uptight about my spelling typo. Perhaps you should take it up again? :lol
 
Wow, over-generalizing, much?

Parenting styles differ, but nothing in my post (or that book), or in Celtic's posts, says that kids should never be punished or disciplined. Punishing also differs from parent to parent. I was never hit or spanked by my parents (oh wait - one time my mom slapped my hand, but she felt bad about it and apologized later), but they had other, stronger (at least in my case), forms of punishment... like embarrassment :lol Our parenting philosophy: let them make their mistakes - sometimes the outcome of making that mistake is punishment enough and they will learn all they need to from that. Sometimes you have to step in and punish them a little bit more, and *that's* what they will learn from.

But in the end, they're still gonna make that mistake no matter what you do or do not do - so all I'm saying is that being overprotective and overbearing and, frankly, disrespectful (making them drive cars with GPS reporting, telling kids they'll get kicked out of the house for doing drugs/alcohol even once, etc etc) can OFTENTIMES (not always) be less beneficial than being a little more lenient and understanding. Especially with the kicking out thing - if it comes to that, does any parent really want to kick their kid out? And if they don't follow through when the forbidden thing inevitably happens, then they'll know their parents are full of empty threats ('if that's a lie, what ELSE is a lie?') - it's a lose-lose situation when it comes to teenagers and ultimatums, unless you are fully prepared to follow through without backing down... which then leads to regrets and all of that horrible cycle that has put so many people in therapy over the years (be it the therapy of drinking too much, or the therapy of visiting a psychiatrist, or the many other forms of therapy in which the human race participates)!

In all of your instances (hot stove, sex, etc) I will do the same things as I will with alcohol/drugs - I will educate him... "Hey, don't touch that!! It's hot and will burn you!"... but that's not necessarily going to stop him from touching a hot stove in the future if he really wants to. And after that he'll never touch it again! Kids *will* always be kids (especially boys - yes, I know what I'm in for!) and parents have to turn their backs at some point, after teaching them as best they can about life. How else are they gonna learn anything for themselves? I was raised that way, as well as with a great respect for privacy... our doors were ALWAYS open (no closed doors in our house - by CHOICE not by some silly parental law), because our parents trusted us to respect their privacy and not bust in, and we trusted them to do the same.

Here's an anecdote from my own life that, ironically, while not an oven, has to do with something hot (I was about 5 at the time and keep in mind this was the very early 80s and they did weird stuff like put hot t-shirt presses up by the cash registers then :lol ... in other words, before the rampant suing of companies for things that were not their fault got way out of hand):

Mom (sees me reaching for the t-shirt press, grabs my hands): "Don't touch that, it's really hot and it'll burn your skin right off!!"
Me (not knowing what 'being burned' really meant): "Okay."

5 minutes later we return to the cash register area to pay for my mom's purchases... meanwhile, I am still fascinated with the t-shirt press, and I don't really believe that it could be THAT hot... so I touch it very lightly with my thumb... it's THAT hot and I have a burned thumb with a huge bubbly blister for the next week... which also fascinated me when it burst one day :sick

Is my mom a bad mom because of that? Not at all! Was the employee a bad employee because of that? Not at all - I was shorter than the counter and she couldn't see me inching up - plus she was doing her job ringing up a sale. Am I a bad kid because of that - maybe a little, but that's what kids do! Did my mom sue the store? No because she knew it was my fault not the store's. Did my mom yell and scream and spank me? No, believe me I learned my lesson without any yelling or punishment of any kind!!

Now, for another anecdote, holding hands and looking both ways while crossing the street is a MUST for kids under a certain age. Again, to avoid the screaming fits if your toddler doesn't want to hold your hand, educate! Obviously on this one you're not gonna let them make their own mistakes, but you can avoid a lot of headaches and fights by educating them on WHY they need to hold your hand, rather than just saying "because I say so" - which really just INVITES them to argue and throw tantrums! (also, in my experiences, simply adding the word 'please' works wonders, especially on polite toddlers who know how to say please and thank you... I may not have a grown child of my own yet, but I've done my part to help raise more than 6 different kids, from nannying to older-sistering.)

But you know what, after I grew out of the age that my mom was making (disguised as requesting) me hold hands when crossing the street, she also forbade me to ride my bike in the street until I was 10 years old. I understood the rule, and I understood WHY she had the rule, but I didn't always follow it to a T and she knew it (parents aren't dumb)... on any given day you could see me zigzagging in and out of the driveways just so I could 'dare' to ride in the street when my parents weren't looking, even if only for a second! I never put myself in danger, I always looked both ways and had the utmost respect for automobiles because of the way I was educated - and my parents knew this so let me get away with that little discretion without punishment or even bringing it up (at the time I thought I was totally getting away with it :lol).

You can compare that anecdote (something that can be super dangerous if done incorrectly - ie: riding your bike in the street) to drug and alcohol use in a responsible teenager who has been educated well. Just because they drink (or smoke pot) occasionally, doesn't make them irresponsible. Now, binge drinking and getting so wasted you forget what you did all night is a different story... my parent's trusted me not to do either, and if I ever had there would have been hell to pay and I would have learned from that mistake. But I was taught well and knew, even as a teenager, that it would be dumb and dangerous to do those things. Seeing my idiot friends do them was enough for me! Coming home slightly wasted was never enough for punishment in our household (cause for embarrassment and family stories, yes!)... but not coming home at all, or going to school wasted was a different story - I honestly have no idea what my parents would have done in those cases because, thanks to their awesome and respectful parenting, it never happened to me or any of my siblings.

I strongly believe that a lot of things these days are too 'baby proofed' to really teach kids lessons. Thus they get out on their own at 18 and go completely NUTS because they were sheltered and lived under so many arbitrary "because I said so" rules for so long. For instance, date rape, binge drinking and self-cutting are MAJOR problems in colleges these days - much more so than in even my college years, which weren't THAT long ago (I graduated in 2000). The book I cited goes more into the causes of that (overbearing 'hothouse' parenting, relationships not based on mutual respect) and doesn't ever say not to punish your kids! That would just be silly.

(Wow, long post! Thank goodness Dax now enjoys long afternoon naps :))


POST OF THE MOTHER ^^^^ING YEAR!!! Daaaaaamn! :rock
 
My principal objection to smoking marijuana is that it is shown to contribute to risks of lung cancer (as, obviously, smoking tobacco cigarettes do as well).


Please post where this has been written, and I don't mean anti-drug sites but any real studies that show this please. This is the opposite of all research I have read about it for the last decade. I would be interested in hearing more.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top