Or you can get the 1:6 line!
That is, if you're into "toys."
Might as well, those also are an upgrade over the Weta pieces...
Or you can get the 1:6 line!
That is, if you're into "toys."
For the record, Weta's ability is still the record to beat. So, I'm really holding Sideshow to a higher level. The Eagle vs FB is showing some innovation at their part, and so is the 12" line. Everything else . . .remains to be seen and judged on a case by case basis.
I was being sarcastic Josh.
Geez . . .who unleashed the Sideshow cavalry?? All I'm saying is that I prefer the Weta bust to this one, no matter how girly it looks. Recall that Weta created the busts not necessarily with the attempts to replicate the actor. For Sideshow to charge me 4x the amount for a Legendary Scale version, likeness is the least that has to be met.
For the record, I already own all the Weta busts and statues, but, I have additionally bought the Gandalf LS bust because they didn't do that bad on that one. If anything, I have the ability to be more selective now because my LOTR cupboard overfloweth. I still bought the Frodo vs Gollum dio, and bought all the 12" figures.
So, Shai and Woodsy, unless you're willing to go mano-a-mano with my LOTR collection, I'd say your opinions don't hold much weight.
For the record, Weta's ability is still the record to beat. So, I'm really holding Sideshow to a higher level. The Eagle vs FB is showing some innovation at their part, and so is the 12" line. Everything else . . .remains to be seen and judged on a case by case basis.
Not really a debate Radagaster, Weta has the advantage of a huge back catalogue of releases to choose from to give them the extra edge here to be fair to SS and as well we all know they (weta) definitely screwed up on plenty of their produce. I don't have all the Weta pieces but I do have most of them and they are for the most part excellent but I do think the quality so far of what we've seen from SS in Dios, PFs and LS Busts is better and more evolved in most cases than Weta, it stands to reason as they have a huge range to learn from, not saying they (SS) have got it right yet either but like I said for the most part what they have done is damn good. I love the Weta stuff too and I think for The Hobbit they will raise the bar even further (we hope!) but for now I think SS are making a decent improvement on whats gone before. Its not a question of better but evolution...........
Lets not forget the oldies were ALL SIDESHOW/WETA pieces not just Weta, so its all good at the end of the day.
I don't collect the LSB's so I haven't been visiting this thread - but I'm a little surprised by the reaction. the LotR fans are usually a little smarter than SW fans and usually realize that photos can be misleading.
Notice the strange position of his head and the angle the eyes are directed. These factors make it appear that he's hunched for no reason and that some things might be a little off. And my apologies to the photoshop experts, but the adjustments I've seen in this thread seem to do more damage than correct anything.
I was also a bit surprising to see the same photo quoted again and again, but then I saw that on the SSC page there are no other photos looking right on. But judging from those photos the likeness is much better than it would appear in this single one that's quoted so much.
Here's a close up of the hi-res version of the pic -
I was being sarcastic Josh.
I think anyone can see it doesn't look cross-eyed. Look at the distance of the iris to the side of the eye - seems to be about equal. The lid on the left eye is lower because he's looking up and to the side - that may be causing a slight illusion that it's cross-eyed.
c'mon Dave. You cant deny something funky is going on there.
take your finger and cover up the left eye on your screen and get adapted to where the other eye is looking. THen after a few seconds uncover the other eye. its not looking where it should be.....
It's an illusion
It's an illusion
Like those things where you stare at something for 30 seconds then look at the wall and see Christ?
Enter your email address to join: