lcummins said:But we never see a prototype until the licensor has approved the sculpt, so it is unlikely that the licensor requested changes (although I guess it is possible even after approval). I'm guessing production problems caused the changes...
pjam said:Oh and thanks brother batty... I'll get to it, geez!
lcummins said:But we never see a prototype until the licensor has approved the sculpt, so it is unlikely that the licensor requested changes (although I guess it is possible even after approval). I'm guessing production problems caused the changes...
FlyAndFight said:...but I learned my lesson with Aragorn:
Proto: 10 of 10
initial pics: 6 of 10
In hand: 8 of 10
It will never be as good as the protos but not as bad as the pics posted...
Agent23 said:I just don't understand how a figure can look so much different then the original prototype?
He looks nothing like the prototype, IMO. He looks like he lost 50 lbs. (if that's possible) and like he aged 30 years....
galactiboy said:I'm interested to see what he looks like in hand... with their notoriously bad photo skills he might not be a square-jawed. But right now he kinda looks like a Jock version of Legolas
pjam said:I must say I DO like the proto sculpt better, seems they widened his eyes and the paint apps on the eyebrows are, again, not great but overall I still think it's a great figure, will wait to have him in hand...
It seems SSC has continued to deliver a product different than the one offered, again HS changes where they were not warranted. I NEVER see changes from Proto to Prod pieces with Medicom or Hot Toys. I just don't understand why SSC is still inconsistent in this area, it is a definite problem.
Wow! The changes are even more pronounced. Why would they do this?Fritz said:I'm not feeling the production images.
To help eliminate paint application in the comparison, here's Josh's pic in grayscale...
Khev said:His face looks like the bald guy from "Who's Line is it Anyway?"
Enter your email address to join: