lcummins said:But we never see a prototype until the licensor has approved the sculpt, so it is unlikely that the licensor requested changes (although I guess it is possible even after approval). I'm guessing production problems caused the changes...
lcummins said:But we never see a prototype until the licensor has approved the sculpt, so it is unlikely that the licensor requested changes (although I guess it is possible even after approval). I'm guessing production problems caused the changes...
FlyAndFight said:...but I learned my lesson with Aragorn:
Proto: 10 of 10
initial pics: 6 of 10
In hand: 8 of 10
It will never be as good as the protos but not as bad as the pics posted...
Agent23 said:I just don't understand how a figure can look so much different then the original prototype?
![]()
He looks nothing like the prototype, IMO. He looks like he lost 50 lbs. (if that's possible) and like he aged 30 years....
galactiboy said:I'm interested to see what he looks like in hand... with their notoriously bad photo skills he might not be a square-jawed. But right now he kinda looks like a Jock version of Legolas![]()
pjam said:I must say I DO like the proto sculpt better, seems they widened his eyes and the paint apps on the eyebrows are, again, not great but overall I still think it's a great figure, will wait to have him in hand...
It seems SSC has continued to deliver a product different than the one offered, again HS changes where they were not warranted. I NEVER see changes from Proto to Prod pieces with Medicom or Hot Toys. I just don't understand why SSC is still inconsistent in this area, it is a definite problem.
Wow! The changes are even more pronounced. Why would they do this?Fritz said:I'm not feeling the production images.
To help eliminate paint application in the comparison, here's Josh's pic in grayscale...
Khev said:His face looks like the bald guy from "Who's Line is it Anyway?"