New Doctor Who 1:6 from Big Chief Studios!

[bloodgear]

Re: New Doctor Who 1:6 and 1:4 from Big Chief Studios!

I'm sure if he even sets foot in Manhattan during that period the whole universe will explode or some such nonsense. They always have to cook up something like that or else the Doctor could just go back and save everybody all the time. That's the achilles heel of time travel stories.

But was there really anything to stop Amy and Rory from causing another paradox and get out. Again. Saving themselves!

 

[thamesvalidude]

Re: New Doctor Who 1:6 and 1:4 from Big Chief Studios!

Even worse, Rory saw himself die in 1938 and his gravestone gave his age. The Doc would therefore know exactly what year he had been transported to. Then they released a small cartoon on line by the writer of the episode showing an adopted son who was born in 1946....BAD WRITING! BAD CONTINUITY!
The Angel story lines only work if you have no idea where they were sent! Nonsense!

 

[Niceman]

Re: New Doctor Who 1:6 and 1:4 from Big Chief Studios!

The Idea that the Doctor can't go back for the ponds is really stupid, So he can never see them again because the tardis won't be able to travel to that place and time but could he not go back a few years later from that date to a different location else and travel to Manhattan without the tardis?

Exactly. Is the whole 20th century off limits to the Doctor now?

 

[ProgMatinee]

It's a tv show guys.

 

[Niceman]

Re: New Doctor Who 1:6 and 1:4 from Big Chief Studios!

Maybe Big Chief's Amy figure got touched by Big Chief's Weeping Angel figure and was release in 1922?

 

[roguebaron]

Re: New Doctor Who 1:6 and 1:4 from Big Chief Studios!

Does anyone else here have a deposit on Amy?

I do, she'll show up eventually. I'm not worried, though an updated photo would be nice.

 

[pixletwin]

Re: New Doctor Who 1:6 and 1:4 from Big Chief Studios!

Maybe Big Chief's Amy figure got touched by Big Chief's Weeping Angel figure and was release in 1922?

Ha, brilliant!

 

[LaSirenofEire]

Re: New Doctor Who 1:6 and 1:4 from Big Chief Studios!

Maybe Big Chief's Amy figure got touched by Big Chief's Weeping Angel figure and was release in 1922?

Maybe we should be scouring the anitque shops then!

 

[DVD1]

Re: New Doctor Who 1:6 and 1:4 from Big Chief Studios!

I do, she'll show up eventually. I'm not worried, though an updated photo would be nice.

Yup.
I think BC should contact deposit payers with some info.

 

[Captain Britain]

Re: New Doctor Who 1:6 and 1:4 from Big Chief Studios!

It's a tv show guys.

The thing that always gets me about Doctor Who is when people say that something in a particular episode is implausible when it's a show about an alien who travels through time in a police box!

I guess there's different levels of implausibility and I don't mind when something is illogical, but only after you've spent some time thinking about it. What I hate is stuff that is dropped in but never gone back to or explained properly (I've still got no idea why the Tardis exploded, if it exploded, or if I ever got an explanation and missed it!).

 

[ProgMatinee]

Re: New Doctor Who 1:6 and 1:4 from Big Chief Studios!

What bothers me is simply when people think because the Doctor said something in an episode filmed in 1973 that all subsequent episodes must build on that same logic...or that a tv subplot can't contradict some comic book that 20,000 people may have read.

Directly contradicting something within an episode or within a season is one thing...but some people just attach too many strings to what should be a much simpler plot or character than they want to make it. Sometimes contradictions occur, especially for a show so large and encompassing so much history.

Just enjoy the show and don't try to unweave every inaccuracy.

 

[TheObsoleteMan]

Re: New Doctor Who 1:6 and 1:4 from Big Chief Studios!

What bothers me is simply when people think because the Doctor said something in an episode filmed in 1973 that all subsequent episodes must build on that same logic...or that a tv subplot can't contradict some comic book that 20,000 people may have read.

Directly contradicting something within an episode or within a season is one thing...but some people just attach too many strings to what should be a much simpler plot or character than they want to make it. Sometimes contradictions occur, especially for a show so large and encompassing so much history.

Just enjoy the show and don't try to unweave every inaccuracy.

In the words of the immortal William Shatner, "It's just a tv show! So, move out of your parent's basements, and get a life, will you people?!"

 

[DVD1]

Re: New Doctor Who 1:6 and 1:4 from Big Chief Studios!

And there was a show that didn't care less about what was said in any previous episode.
Each story was stand alone and sometimes completely changed or ignored things that gone on before. Good old Bill.

Now, BC, has Amy got a time frame yet for production/distribution?

 

[thamesvalidude]

Re: New Doctor Who 1:6 and 1:4 from Big Chief Studios!

Now, BC, has Amy got a time frame yet for production/distribution?

 

[TheObsoleteMan]

Re: New Doctor Who 1:6 and 1:4 from Big Chief Studios!

I'd be surprised if we got any new info until after the holidays.

 

[TheEnemy]

Re: New Doctor Who 1:6 and 1:4 from Big Chief Studios!

Anyone have any idea what the hold up is? Suddenly BCS has gone stagnant. Plus is there anyone else beside me that thinks that if they could produce an Amy (which is a rather drawl character IMO) then the least they could do is produce (even a bloody proto!) of 9, Rose and Sarah-Jane (seeing as she was with Tom, Peter, Chris and David, not to mention having Matt star in a two parter of SJA!!!)

 

[pixletwin]

Re: New Doctor Who 1:6 and 1:4 from Big Chief Studios!

Anyone have any idea what the hold up is? Suddenly BCS has gone stagnant. Plus is there anyone else beside me that thinks that if they could produce an Amy (which is a rather drawl character IMO) then the least they could do is produce (even a bloody proto!) of 9, Rose and Sarah-Jane (seeing as she was with Tom, Peter, Chris and David, not to mention having Matt star in a two parter of SJA!!!)

1) The hold-up on Amy is that BC has had to deal with factory issues and a bad female base body.
2) I have no doubt they will get round to doing Doc9.
3) It is a well known fact that Billie Piper (Rose) likely won't give permission to use her likeness.
4) Not to be pedantic, but SJS was never in a story with Eccleston. But I too would like a Sarah Jane Smith (Hand of Evil costume).

 

[TheEnemy]

Re: New Doctor Who 1:6 and 1:4 from Big Chief Studios!

Oops sorry, my bad about the Chris-SJA bit but all things said, time to rally for a 9 and Sarah-Jane!!! Plus for pete's sake, I think the same argument can be made for k-9!

 

[pixletwin]

Re: New Doctor Who 1:6 and 1:4 from Big Chief Studios!

Yes to all of the above.

 

[TheEnemy]

Re: New Doctor Who 1:6 and 1:4 from Big Chief Studios!

Btw anyone have any HS casts of 9?