NFL Thread

Collector Freaks Forum

Help Support Collector Freaks Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Bingo!



You are completely ignorant to information. It is amazing the lack of knowledge you have on this subject yet you open your mouth and act like you know. Just sad.

Lowering the balls to the lowest LEGAL limit is not cheating at all. Nothing is wrong with that. Nothing at all. Every single QB who likes them over-inflated or under-inflated push the PSI to the maximum legal limit.

Tom Brady is not hiding. He is the only one to go under oath. He asked if they need his phone. They told Tom Brady they did not require his phone. After learning this... he destroyed it and got a new one. A famous person like him probably has personal things he rather keep secret and not risk leaking out. A few hundred bucks is chump change for him anyway. I thought he said it was a common practice for him to do anyways.

So please.... tell me how he is not cooperating? He is cooperating to the fullest extent.
So please.... tell me how benefiting.... is cheating.... when he never broke a rule!

Next time you decide to open your mouth, at least have some relevant knowledgeable information to add.
If he asked them to make sure that were at the lowest legal level why the hell would've just not said that? This would have been over in two seconds yet he we are over a year later so there is no way that true. The team would have never taken the penalty they took. Sorry you don't take what amounts to a plea bargain when your innocent.

Who is they, who the NFLPA? Guess what they don't make that decision. So you know what they screwed him with bad info, and he destroyed his phone. Then he "tried" to get that info back? Sorry you know what happens when I get a new phone all the old info moves over unless you purposely make sure it doesn't. No one is questioning that cost of destroying a phone, hell I get a new phone all the time too and make pennies compared to him.

So again if he said make them at the lowest legal level why did he and the the guys who are in charge of the balls just say that? If your innocent and have a real innocently proving story you say it but they never have. Someone decided to make them lower then the legal limit. So that was oneonfotwo people Tom or Bill. No one with a speck of a brain would believe that those attendants decided to do this on their own and if they had you don't think they would have just come out and said that, he'll they already lost their jobs what more do they have to lose.

What does he gain by deflated balls, let's see he already said he like them a lowest level, and anyone with a brain knows that the lower the ball the easier to grip for no only him, running backs and receivers also benefit. So if you get benefits from illegal equipment that cheating plain and simple.

Someone told those guys to do what they did, and only two people have the power to do it, Bill and Tom end of story. So either Tom cheated and told them to do it and is trying to not get caught or Bill told them to do it and Bill who already has his strike and another he was done so they have to cover up what happened. At this point to believe that no one told them to lower it below the limit and they didn't do that or they did it on their own is ignorant at this point because this would have been done and over.
 
HAHAHA! **** YOU DENVER!

Brock is gone!
Malik is gone!


latest
 
The exodus continues: in addition to Malik Jackson and Brock Osweiler leaving, Danny Trevathan leaves Denver to sign with Chicago.
 
Flags fly forever, if you are a Bronco fan you take your 7 win season next year with a ****ing smile. Elway built that team to peak in 2015/16 and nailed his objective. You do have to wonder though how things would have played out if Brock hadn't been benched after one of his RBs fumbled.
 
Flags fly forever, if you are a Bronco fan you take your 7 win season next year with a ****ing smile. Elway built that team to peak in 2015/16 and nailed his objective. You do have to wonder though how things would have played out if Brock hadn't been benched after one of his RBs fumbled.

Yeah I agree. Everyone knew that they would lose players especially on that D that was so dominant last year but they still got a ring. I don't blame them for not signing Brock for that kind of money. 18M a year for someone who played 7 games and not all that great. Go after Fitzpatrick for less that what Brock got, pickup a QB to sit and learn in the draft. The other option would be see what's left on RG3S tank anfor draft someone. If their D is even 80% of what it was last year either of those could get them into the playoffs.

I have a feeling the Texans next year will be just a QB short of being a contender something they have been pretty much the entire time they have existed.
 
If he asked them to make sure that were at the lowest legal level why the hell would've just not said that? This would have been over in two seconds yet he we are over a year later so there is no way that true. The team would have never taken the penalty they took. Sorry you don't take what amounts to a plea bargain when your innocent.

Kraft took the penalty to get this over with.... he wanted it to stop and thought the penalty would reduce Brady's penalty.... that clearly didn't happen.

Who is they, who the NFLPA? Guess what they don't make that decision. So you know what they screwed him with bad info, and he destroyed his phone. Then he "tried" to get that info back? Sorry you know what happens when I get a new phone all the old info moves over unless you purposely make sure it doesn't. No one is questioning that cost of destroying a phone, hell I get a new phone all the time too and make pennies compared to him.

Funny that he never texted the accused "deflaters."

So again if he said make them at the lowest legal level why did he and the the guys who are in charge of the balls just say that? If your innocent and have a real innocently proving story you say it but they never have. Someone decided to make them lower then the legal limit. So that was oneonfotwo people Tom or Bill. No one with a speck of a brain would believe that those attendants decided to do this on their own and if they had you don't think they would have just come out and said that, he'll they already lost their jobs what more do they have to lose.

Be ignorant to information.

What does he gain by deflated balls, let's see he already said he like them a lowest level, and anyone with a brain knows that the lower the ball the easier to grip for no only him, running backs and receivers also benefit. So if you get benefits from illegal equipment that cheating plain and simple.

Not Brady's fault the ball was below the limit due to the temps. He played better in the second half anyways with the proclaimed "proper inflated" balls. It had no impact. I guess you didn't think of that though.

Joe Montana can't be GOAT either according to your logic. His lineman cheated. Which gave Joe an unfair advantage due to the benefits he received from the cheating line.

Thought this was interesting. These are people who have no dog in the race. Completely neutral.

Deflate-gate Poll: More Americans believe NFL than Tom Brady

43.4% of the general public believe the NFL versus only 16.3% believe Brady the Cheater. (40.3% were undecided)

Deflate-gate Poll: More Americans believe NFL than Tom Brady | Shutdown Corner - Yahoo Sports

I would like to know what sampling technique was used in this poll. I'm sure Yahoo is just as bias as ESPN was in trying to destroy Brady's reputation.
 
Thought this was interesting. These are people who have no dog in the race. Completely neutral.

Deflate-gate Poll: More Americans believe NFL than Tom Brady

43.4% of the general public believe the NFL versus only 16.3% believe Brady the Cheater. (40.3% were undecided)

Deflate-gate Poll: More Americans believe NFL than Tom Brady | Shutdown Corner - Yahoo Sports

Not surprising. Anyone who can be objective about the situation knows what's what. Most of that 16% are probably Brady lovers from other places.
 
Ok, back on track…. My two teams.

Bucs – Keep Martin = GREAT. Got Sweez = decent. Fills a need and he will do fine.
Seahawks – Lose Irvin, Mebane, Sweezy and probably Kearse. Kind of a bummer but none were top “have to keep guys.” Keep Lane and Rubin. Good moves.. both are up and comers.

Overall I am happy with my teams doings so far.
 
Apparently, the Broncos (among other teams) are considering trading for Colin Kaepernick. Out of RGIII, Kaepernick, and Ryan Fitzpatrick (who's at a contract stalemate with the Jets), I think Fitzpatrick would be the best fit. Even with the loss of Malik Jackson and Danny Trevathan, that defense is still pretty good, and a journeyman QB could do well. Fitz obviously doesn't have the potential upside of RGIII and Kap, but he's a known quantity and a proven pocket passer.
 
Ok, back on track…. My two teams.

Bucs – Keep Martin = GREAT. Got Sweez = decent. Fills a need and he will do fine.
Seahawks – Lose Irvin, Mebane, Sweezy and probably Kearse. Kind of a bummer but none were top “have to keep guys.” Keep Lane and Rubin. Good moves.. both are up and comers.

Overall I am happy with my teams doings so far.

You are happy the Seahawks lost four starters.... which they won't even have the cap space to replace because Lynch is still on the books?
 
Apparently, the Broncos (among other teams) are considering trading for Colin Kaepernick. Out of RGIII, Kaepernick, and Ryan Fitzpatrick (who's at a contract stalemate with the Jets), I think Fitzpatrick would be the best fit. Even with the loss of Malik Jackson and Danny Trevathan, that defense is still pretty good, and a journeyman QB could do well. Fitz obviously doesn't have the potential upside of RGIII and Kap, but he's a known quantity and a proven pocket passer.

I guess you forgot Fitz had two pro bowl receivers and a top five defense and he still couldn't get to the playoffs. How is going to Denver.... where they have no running back.... soon to be no linebackers.... going to improve his capabilities? Plus... look back through history and tell me how many all time great defenses have won another Super Bowl? Ravens? No. Bucs? No. Seahawks? No. Broncos? Not now. Fitz won't be in Denver. Kap or RGIII will be.

Of course since you blocked me you won't be able to see this and know you are wrong.
 
You are happy the Seahawks lost four starters.... which they won't even have the cap space to replace because Lynch is still on the books?

They had to lose somebody and the ones they lost are not THAT big of a deal (and were all expected to go anyway)... they have replacements... the Seahawks will be fine.
 
Apparently, the Broncos (among other teams) are considering trading for Colin Kaepernick. Out of RGIII, Kaepernick, and Ryan Fitzpatrick (who's at a contract stalemate with the Jets), I think Fitzpatrick would be the best fit. Even with the loss of Malik Jackson and Danny Trevathan, that defense is still pretty good, and a journeyman QB could do well. Fitz obviously doesn't have the potential upside of RGIII and Kap, but he's a known quantity and a proven pocket passer.

I would take Fitzpatrick
 
Back
Top