Re: Official Alien Prequel/Prometheus Discussion Thread
I dont think anyone has said this last. Its not quite that simple. The destruction of the head was a scientific disaster: they destroyed the most valuable relic they had so far, all so they could go all Dr Frankenstein on said valuable relic. It was a bad call, Ripley, it was a bad call.... Experimenting on the head was not for them to do: this should have been saved for transportation to Earth.
This adventure should have been far bigger than excavating a tomb, and a scientist of all people should be expecting to delay gratification. This is what rings false to many of us.
Now as to the 5,000 [or 2,000, or however old it was] year old head still having liquid blood inside it, thats another one of those plot discrepancies I was talking about earlier. 5000 year old relics do not have anything liquid in them, except perhaps on a molecular level.
I DONT want to hate it. I am very disappointed. That's not hate. its great sadness.
My point was that although he's a scientist, he's still a human. And meeting the beings who created you is...the most..important and exciting thing imaginable? It's not like they're digging up a new Egyptian pharaoh's tomb.. It's bigger than your profession.
He has every right to be disappointed and frown for a few hours.
But, if Ridley Scott knew anything about film making..or common sense for that matter, he would know that Holloway should have been smiling and clapping when the head exploded. The disappointed look on his face shows irresponsibility and lack of intelligence. Movie ruined.
I dont think anyone has said this last. Its not quite that simple. The destruction of the head was a scientific disaster: they destroyed the most valuable relic they had so far, all so they could go all Dr Frankenstein on said valuable relic. It was a bad call, Ripley, it was a bad call.... Experimenting on the head was not for them to do: this should have been saved for transportation to Earth.
This adventure should have been far bigger than excavating a tomb, and a scientist of all people should be expecting to delay gratification. This is what rings false to many of us.
Now as to the 5,000 [or 2,000, or however old it was] year old head still having liquid blood inside it, thats another one of those plot discrepancies I was talking about earlier. 5000 year old relics do not have anything liquid in them, except perhaps on a molecular level.
It's almost as if you all actually want to hate the movie.
I DONT want to hate it. I am very disappointed. That's not hate. its great sadness.