Oscar Best Picture nominees up to 10

Collector Freaks Forum

Help Support Collector Freaks Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

Batty

Nexus 6
Joined
Jan 21, 2006
Messages
20,096
Reaction score
48
Location
Off World
The Academy has decided to increase the number of films eligible for the "Best Picture" category from 5 to 10. We'll probably see more comedy, fantasy, sci-fi and superhero movies nominated.

A little late for The Dark Knight. :monkey3

Beverly Hills, CA (June 24, 2009) — The 82nd Academy Awards, which will be presented on March 7, 2010, will have 10 feature films vying in the Best Picture category, Academy Motion Picture Arts and Sciences President Sid Ganis announced today (June 24) at a press conference in Beverly Hills.

“After more than six decades, the Academy is returning to some of its earlier roots, when a wider field competed for the top award of the year,” said Ganis. “The final outcome, of course, will be the same – one Best Picture winner – but the race to the finish line will feature 10, not just five, great movies from 2009.”

For more than a decade during the Academy’s earlier years, the Best Picture category welcomed more than five films; for nine years there were 10 nominees. The 16th Academy Awards (1943) was the last year to include a field of that size; “Casablanca” was named Best Picture. (In 1931/32, there were eight nominees and in 1934 and 1935 there were 12 nominees.)

Currently, the Academy is presenting a bicoastal screening series showcasing the 10 Best Picture nominees of 1939, arguably one of Hollywood’s greatest film years. Best Picture nominees of that year include such diverse classics as “Mr. Smith Goes to Washington,” “Stagecoach,” “The Wizard of Oz” and Best Picture winner “Gone with the Wind.”

“Having 10 Best Picture nominees is going allow Academy voters to recognize and include some of the fantastic movies that often show up in the other Oscar categories, but have been squeezed out of the race for the top prize,” commented Ganis. “I can’t wait to see what that list of ten looks like when the nominees are announced in February.”

The 82nd Academy Awards nominations will be announced on Tuesday, February 2. The Oscar® ceremony honoring films for 2009 will again take place at the Kodak Theatre at Hollywood & Highland Center® in Hollywood, and will be televised live by the ABC Television Network.
 
More money for studios. They can now slap "Academy Award Nominee" on more of their home video releases, even if the film is ^^^^acular.
 
There used to be more movies nominated but they cut it back years ago. I don't have a problem with it.

Yes, I understand that (it says so in that article), but there's probably a valid and good reason why they stopped doing that back in 1943.

My point still stands.
 
Darknight would have definitely been nominated. And in fact this should help the ratings slide of the broadcast which hasn't had spectacular ratings since the populist Return of the King swept the board. Most nominees haven't been seen or even heard of by the majority of the movie going public, now there will be incentive to watch the show for many people who previously felt left out.

However I'm not really in favor of this - what's next, bringing back Rob Lowe and Snow White to host?
 
Dark Knight should've been nominated as is. They should keep it at 5.
 
I bet lots of people here will want Transformers 2 nominated for best movie at the Next Oscars...yep, lots of cacas here.
 
Whether you have a choice between the best 5 or the best 10, presumably one of the best 5 is going to win anyway. So why throw 5 others in there as filler? As said before, I'm sure it is because there is money to be made.

But, whatever. The Oscars are a complete joke, and the votes seem very rarely to be based on actual merit. It is more "it is time for actor/director X to win."
 
Whether you have a choice between the best 5 or the best 10, presumably one of the best 5 is going to win anyway. So why throw 5 others in there as filler? As said before, I'm sure it is because there is money to be made.

But, whatever. The Oscars are a complete joke, and the votes seem very rarely to be based on actual merit. It is more "it is time for actor/director X to win."

This is true but i've always given them credit for rewarding the right film almost every year. Not always in every category but best picture at least.

This is totally about making extra moola, pfffft greedy bastards.
 
Back
Top