Unless Zimmerman physically threatened or attacked Martin, Martin had no excuse for assaulting him. If Zimmerman felt his life was threatened by the beating he was receiving, he had every right to use deadly force in retaliation. Personally, if I am armed and threatened with assault, I will draw on my attacker(s). I don't care if they are unarmed.
Zimmerman didn't kill Trayvon Martin. He just carried the bullet a while.
Key elements in Zimmerman's story certainly couldn't be ruled out, indeed he was acquitted because honestly we just didn't have all that much to go on regarding the actual fighting. To be fair to the Martins, we don't know who started the physical stuff. There are some common sense inconsistencies though that keep me thinking the prosecution dropped the ball on making a case for manslaughter.
The only story that would utterly convince me he wasn't 100% responsible is if Trayvon was actively went for the gun leaving George no other option. My problem with Zimmerman's basic stance is that it happens to be the absolute extreme version of events:
- Where Trayvon is the complete 17 year-old 158-pound thug who was so physically dominating as to convince a 29 year old full-bodied George that his life was in danger. George technically waived the "stand your ground" defense anyway.
- When the badly beaten George refuses medical treatment, then later arranges for a family physician to treat him. Call me crazy but aren't black eyes supposed to be visible within the first hour of recieving them? The county medical examiner on the other hand stated George's injuries at the time were "very insignificant".
- In the space of two minutes between the time he hung up with 911 and the time the police pulled up, Zimmerman... yelled help "probably 50 times" while getting his head slammed against concrete some "25 times" and came away with wounds that nearly disappeared after they were cleaned up.
I don't know about you guys but once I really looked at that, it certainly opened up Zimmerman's account to the possibility of exaggeration if not all out fabrication.
At any rate, I think Weiner and Prince George gave us a much needed reprieve from the navel-gazing Questing Beast that is racism in America. What is the standard for progress if not measured by equality under the law? It's easier to make blanket statements about race instead of focusing on the issue at hand which in this case involved just two people.
If it's not the accused, it's the cops. If it's not the cops, it's the prosecution. If it's not the prosecution, it's the judge. If it's not the judge it's the jury. If nothing else, it's all of them. Racism becomes a roving accusation that no one can dispute. So the fire spreads as many base their standards on incredibly stupid people.