Key elements in Zimmerman's story certainly couldn't be ruled out, indeed he was acquitted because honestly we just didn't have all that much to go on regarding the actual fighting. To be fair to the Martins, we don't know who started the physical stuff. There are some common sense inconsistencies though that keep me thinking the prosecution dropped the ball on making a case for manslaughter.
The only story that would utterly convince me he wasn't 100% responsible is if Trayvon was actively went for the gun leaving George no other option. My problem with Zimmerman's basic stance is that it happens to be the absolute extreme version of events:
- Where Trayvon is the complete 17 year-old 158-pound thug who was so physically dominating as to convince a 29 year old full-bodied George that his life was in danger. George technically waived the "stand your ground" defense anyway.
- When the badly beaten George refuses medical treatment, then later arranges for a family physician to treat him. Call me crazy but aren't black eyes supposed to be visible within the first hour of recieving them? The county medical examiner on the other hand stated George's injuries at the time were "very insignificant".
- In the space of two minutes between the time he hung up with 911 and the time the police pulled up, Zimmerman... yelled help "probably 50 times" while getting his head slammed against concrete some "25 times" and came away with wounds that nearly disappeared after they were cleaned up.
I don't know about you guys but once I really looked at that, it certainly opened up Zimmerman's account to the possibility of exaggeration if not all out fabrication.
At any rate, I think Weiner and Prince George gave us a much needed reprieve from the navel-gazing Questing Beast that is racism in America. What is the standard for progress if not measured by equality under the law? It's easier to make blanket statements about race instead of focusing on the issue at hand which in this case involved just two people.
If it's not the accused, it's the cops. If it's not the cops, it's the prosecution. If it's not the prosecution, it's the judge. If it's not the judge it's the jury. If nothing else, it's all of them. Racism becomes a roving accusation that no one can dispute. So the fire spreads as many base their standards on incredibly stupid people.
well, there is the one eyewitness who saw Trayvon on top of Zimmerman beating him up.
So there is a witness who saw that.
As far as who started the confrontation, Zimmerman had injuries while Trayon did not. Besides the gunshot so if Zimmerman attacked him first why didn't Trayvon had any injuries?
There was something I found very interesting and quite telling about this,
when Rachel Jeantel went to do that interview with Piers Morgan,
He asked her what they meant by "craka" she explained how they used that word to describe someone like a policeman or a security guard, Not just to describe a white person, but...
did she mean that Trayvon jumped on someone he thought was a security guard or a cop? That is something that made me wonder. Because if he used that word to describe Zimmerman, did she do that to not appear racist for using that word? because she makes it look like Trayvon jumped on someone who he thought was a cop or security.