- Joined
- May 31, 2011
- Messages
- 19,885
- Reaction score
- 292
Re: Rate The Last Movie You Watched.
...
...
Drive isn't an indy movie. .
Blame the studio, and test audience. Bunch of idiots.
However though, I still want to see if the practical effects were as bad as they said. ADI is an alright company. But I did like the look of all the monsters they did.
Especially the final one. Better then whatever that turd thing was.
*light spoilers* basically just stuff from the trailers
There were many problems right out of the gate. We're shown the Antartic in Winter except it's light out. It would always be dark.
Aside from the fact the movie is incredibly rushed, about 72 mins, the characters are no where near as likable or easy to get to know as the ones in Carpenter's. The only character that really stood out for me was Lars who spoke no english.
They showed way, way too much of the Things and reduced it to the creatures outright stalking around the facility like a Predator. I get The Thing hasn't learned as much about humans yet and that makes some sense but they show way too much of the Things and they are always covered in CGi.
The CGI is some of the worst I have seen in years, really bad. You can see they just layed it over the practical effects that look 100 times better in ADI's behind the scenes video. The only cgi used should have been for when the skin itself was actually splitting apart or melding togeather and for adding some blood.
There is no cgi blood at all, and this is a huge problem especially during the Grigs split. (Don't worry thats not a spoiler its the one we see in the heli in the trailer so it was already ruined.) During this split open of his face and chest cavity it looks totally 2d, no depth to the cavities and no blood so when we see the skin tearing, it also looks just like someone took a picture of the actor in Windows Paint and cut and pasted it to achieve the skin ripping, like South Park. Like the old Colorforms toys. The sound is pretty bad and the monster yells always sound forced and no where near as unnatural and frightening as in Carpenters. When Grigs changed I would have laughed if I wasn't so heartbroken.
The ending change is so clear and evidant that it's painful to watch and you question wtf they are thinking covering up the original monster with that tetris computer effect and showing off this totally cgi'd terrible looking thing straight outta the movie Slither. Btw thats according the CGI company who just did an interview at Outpost 31 the 1st of this month, the only thing that changed after test audiences, they covered the original pilot for the new person thing.
They got some stuff incredibly right like the use of the music in certain scenes, the way some of the monsters end up that we know from Carpenter's revist to this outpost. The lack of Norwegian spoken is totally unbelivable and gets very bothersome, especially because without a shadow of a doubt, the best, most intense, well executed, suspensful scene comes from a language barrier between nervous characters in the tight hallway.
Also when it retreads ground with things like the idea for the bloodtest, its way too shot per shot from Carpenters, espcecially stupid because the fillings test is enough and original enough to work on it's own.
CGI without a doubt completely killed however, what would have otherwise probably been a 7/10 all things considered. But without a single believable monster effect the entire movie cannot be taken seriously.
The short version is when he sits in the theatre watching bits from a film roll.Probably the one you have seen because the alternate extended ending isn't that great.But i think you know what it is,the one thing that was missing in the main characters life.You can find it on youtube.
Reservoir Dogs, Donnie Darko, Night Of The Living Dead, Memento even the first Terminator which had a small budget an unproven director and a shady actor in it's leading role are or can be all considered independent films.You fund it yourself. Personally, with help from various friends and family. Independent film. But it IS funded by a studio, just not a big studio. And then picked up.
Tangled - 9/10