for shame! For shame! For shame!!!
I'm sure it's come up in the other thread, but I still laugh (well, internally), when I think about the first battle with Azog, that has the dwarf "hitting" an orc and missing by at least a foot.
I killed them all.
Anyway, movie's still good. Same score applies.
But....but but but....the movie doesn't look that good to me. 48fps converted to 24fps is better...but I can still see it. The characters have some unatural movement from time to time, especially The Goblin King.
But, it's not bad. For the most part, I can see everything, the action scenes were crystal clear, for me anyway, and slowing everything down improved the CGI. Especially the Gollum stuff.
Everything is so bright and digital looking. Eh. I wish they color corrected it as well.
Still, a better experience then 48fps. (My review of the film was the same. It hasn't changed, other then I wish that 80% of that Elvish city scene would get cut. None of it is important to the plot of THIS film.)
LOL I bet a few who voted negatively also did it for the fact that no hot women were in it...LOL...A couple of skinny elf chicks were in it for a few seconds but...
Until you see the next one, or all three we won't know the true significance of alot of things in the first film.
Did you see this in just 24fps or 3D?
Saw it in all three formats and there is nothing about the 24 that made me personally think about the 48. CP I think your so fixated on that the 48 is crap it's colored your opinion.
The cities name is Rivendell by the way. The Rivendell stuff is important to the time line of The Hobbit. So it's fine as is and as far as I know they will add a little more in the EE.
Stick to Michael Bay CP.
LOL I bet a few who voted negatively also did it for the fact that no hot women were in it...LOL...A couple of skinny elf chicks were in it for a few seconds but...
Shut your foul mouth lol. Cate is sexy.
Shut your foul mouth lol. Cate is sexy.
Shooot!...I forgot about him....Wait a minute?...Cate Blanchett is a woman?...