Ok glad it's not just me. I've been seeing for awhile that Hamill is nearly as tall as Ford, and yet I never got that impression at all while watching the movies. Ford always seemed a heckuva lot taller to me.
Love this one.
Fantastic pics Mark (as I would expect!). Great pose, and very good futzing too. They do demonstrate how good this looks when you can't see the eye area. The overhead Detolf lighting really does create some great shadow from the visor? Really captures Ford. I would say if you were to base your opinions just on your photos, it's the first 1/6th sculpt to really capture Ford. . From the eyes down. I think your eyes look a lot better than Jason's as well though, how much variation are we going to see in these? Which is a concern for the rest of us.
No. Port issue has just been settled supposedly but there will still be a delay in sideshow getting this figure due to the port backlog. Hopefully in the next couple weeks. These first two were eBay purchases I believe.
Yeah Han seems to hold up rather well next to the HT figure. At least from a distance.
Yup, Ford should be noticeably taller than Hamill (reportedly 6'1" versus under 5'9"), but HT's Luke is also a bit too tall.
Looks like someone else was interested in the actors' heights too:
So what's the deal with the hatless head - anyone got one out there to set up with the Bespin jacket yet or what??
Why are there no pics of the unhooded Han. And I don't mean those crappy blurry pics from asia. Why aren't the people that have in hand not posting the unhooded hs
We should not be having to swap out bodies at this price point. It's getting ridiculous.
No matter how good this looks with the top have of the face in shadow (and it does look great judging by Marks pics), the eyes are still inexcusable for this price in this day and age.
Yeah, I know what you mean, but these latest pics do make the eyes look a little better. It's the definition of the eyelids that's lacking, but it doesn't look massively behind HT's eyes (though I know that Luke is a couple of years ago now, and Han is just being released now.) Sideshow really needs to view these pics and make the necessary changes. As many have noted, if knock-off companies and basic military figures that are cheaper (like DID) can totally nail these things, then Sideshow should be able to. Still, I'm pretty happy with this Han now.
Yeah, I know what you mean, but these latest pics do make the eyes look a little better. It's the definition of the eyelids that's lacking, but it doesn't look massively behind HT's eyes (though I know that Luke is a couple of years ago now, and Han is just being released now.) Sideshow really needs to view these pics and make the necessary changes. As many have noted, if knock-off companies and basic military figures that are cheaper (like DID) can totally nail these things, then Sideshow should be able to.
Where are Ford's eye lashes in that sculpt
That Luke also has PERS though which most people agree can throw off a sculpt. In general I think Hot Toys' sculpts are stronger than Sideshow's.That's a really interesting side-by-side. While I like both companies, on memory alone I would generally say "HT production heads will beat SSC's." But based on that one image, I'll take that Han Solo over that Luke.
In general I think Hot Toys' sculpts are stronger than Sideshow's.
Ford's eyelids naturally fold like that, as do many people's. But yeah, they could have glued some tiny lashes on there. IMO, the eyes look pretty good. There really isn't much comparison to either Drake nor Snake out-of-box, which has been a giant relief.
Sideshow, keep moving forward, no back-slipping now.
That Luke also has PERS though which most people agree can throw off a sculpt. In general I think Hot Toys' sculpts are stronger than Sideshow's.
In general you're right. But in 2015, it looks like that's been turned on its head. HT has yet to show a decent SW sculpt apart from the Stormtroopers - and I personally don't mind Chewbacca, though I agree the face isn't as good as it could have been.
That's a really interesting side-by-side. While I like both companies, on memory alone I would generally say "HT production heads will beat SSC's." But based on that one image, I'll take that Han Solo over that Luke.
HT does a strange thing for eyelashes with those tiny, very even "dashes" painted on the lower lids, but the illusion somehow works really well.
Maybe you could do something similar with an extremely fine brush (hey, people seemed to take the time to scrape away HT Indy's "guyliner"...) on Han Hoth. It definitely needs a very subtle "something" on those lower lids - maybe even just a thin line of darker flesh color.
The eyelids on this Han Hoth (as opposed to Para's in the earlier pics) don't look as "cut with a scalpel" but in looking at Para's pics, it may just have been the angle they were shot at. The pic above may be a precise "sweet spot" angle for this figure where the likeness just clicks in, like HT Indy where the likeness is there, but then dissipates from even a slight change in angle. Para's eyes don't look that different in terms of paint and molding.
Enter your email address to join: