RandomHero
Super Freak
No, no, no... that's PT raised-and-bred misinformation. And it's far from fair. The focus of the OT is hardly Vader. That's a quaint view from hindsight when one watches the PT. But the PT does not change the narrative of the OT.
The PT twisted the OT into something it was not in regards to Vader. His redemption is a nice character arc finale in the OT. But to say the OT is a narrative about Anakin is really to not understand storytelling. Other than Vader's redemption, there is no real story growth that occurs for Vader.... until the last 15 minutes of the entire trilogy.
The OT is Luke's story. He saves his corrupted father. The light that the PT sheds on Anakin/Vader simply aids that moment in ROTJ when Vader kills the Emperor to save his son. Admittedly it plays much better knowing the PT than it did originally. Because originally there wasn't much drama to Vader's character. It's all heresay... and then he finally turns good after all.
While you make good points, remember, the OT was released as episodes 4,5, and 6...meaning there was a backstory to those movies that hadn't been filmed. I remember when I was a kid in the 90s collecting Star Wars toys and the cards with the background on the figures even explained how Obi-Wan knocked Anakin Skywalker into a lava pit and turned him into a cyborg. The story was there...it just wasn't put on screen. It's hard to acknowledge because the PT (minus Revenge of the Sith, which was quite good in my opinion) was utter crap, but Star Wars 1-6 was always intended to be the story of Anakin. He was the one who was supposed to bring balance to the Force, and he did, by destroying Palpatine. Luke might have brought brought the good out of him, but when he killed the Emperor, he redeemed himself and destroyed the Sith, as was his destiny.
Again, I know it's hard because we all grew up loving the OT, and most of us try and ignore the PT, but Anakin is the main character of Star Wars.