Star Trek Beyond

Collector Freaks Forum

Help Support Collector Freaks Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
I don't think it needs to be a new character to be tokenism. If it feels forced or put in there for no particular reason it's the same thing.

I'm all for gay rights and representation, but there seems to be an obsession with "retrofitting" characters' sexuality lately. I think it's from the media reporting on fans' gay memes.
 
Last edited:
Ah, who cares what that old queen thinks. Old gay people are as irrelevant as old straight people. EQUALITY NOW!:yess:
 
Happy to hear Takei's take on it all. I hate when they change things just for the sake of changing them and pandering to society. Create new characters of different race, gender, sexual orientation.
 
Rumor is the movie is really bad and they threw this in it to try and help ticket sales:pfft:. And it looks like it back fired since George is pissed about it. Although I'm a Trekkie, I wouldn't go see this crap. JJ Arams already ruined it and also star wars.
 
tumblr_lruvrglTPM1qedb29o1_500.gif
 
Rumor is the movie is really bad and they threw this in it to try and help ticket sales:pfft:. And it looks like it back fired since George is pissed about it. Although I'm a Trekkie, I wouldn't go see this crap. JJ Arams already ruined it and also star wars.

Oh that's just BS. Probably being said by people either don't like the movies, or don't like the idea of Sulu being gay.
 
Too many Chris's in Hollywood. :lol
Early reviews seem positive, and I'm guessing they got some good reactions from test audiences to announce another movie this early.
 
Back
Top