- Joined
- Apr 19, 2013
- Messages
- 10,935
- Reaction score
- 4,831
Boy you really got riled up by KK's t-shirts didn't you.
I get riled up when mega-corporations appropriate meaningful ideas and pervert them, yes.
Fortunately for myself I don't give a **** what some executive wears for photo ops, I'm only concerned with the end product.
You already know what I think of their end product.
So what if Finn was a lifelong warrior who fought alongside capable women. So was Kyle Reese and *he* took Sarah's hand when helping her flee. Why? Because she was still a *civilian.*
I don't think you can ignore the fact that the two films and scenes are tonally very different. Reese was played as a soldier on a mission and Connor was immediately portrayed as completely out-of-her-depth. Finn was played as a comedic fish out of water while Rey was a cardboard cut-out of a 'strong woman'.
So it's bad if a woman is presented as capable
No.
and it's bad if that same woman is *incapable* of resisting the lure of an abusive or manipulative man.
The point of my post was pointing out the hypocrisy of Disney's virtue-signaling. Their protagonist gains dimensionality via her relationship with an abuser. It's a cheap shortcut and a hackneyed one at that.
And then when she *does* resist him and only accepts him after he has fully redeemed himself let me guess,
The messaging flies in the face of the "YAY WE'RE FEMINIST NOW" party line the corporation was spewing.
it's still bad, lol. It sounds like someone just likes to complain.
There is a difference between 'someone who likes to complain' and an honest critique. Not everything comes down to 'fans' or 'haters'. I'm not some isolated crank with a bone to pick. I wanted to like this trilogy.