I've actually been enjoying this show through Grace's reviews
And man, even she shredded it to pieces...
i still love her
I've actually been enjoying this show through Grace's reviews
And man, even she shredded it to pieces...
Me too. She is very New York.i still love her
*Shrug*
IMO it was just a set-up for a season 2, so that in the end they could rip off Kylo's arc and say "well, Plagueis was pulling the strings all the time, these serial killers aren't RESPONSIBLE" e.g. Plagueis was lurking around a cave to see his GRAND PLAN unfold.
Oh good lord, it really doesn't get much nerdier than that!Ah, here was the comic (via screenrant) https://screenrant.com/star-wars-anakin-father-emperor/#:~:text=Yes, Star Wars fans, Darth,performed personally by Emperor Palpatine.
Well, yes. When know one knows what's going on and everything has to be explained. Sounds like good writing.Does it need explanation?
Yeah I never imagined Jedi were invading peoples homes and kidnaping children, killing their mothers, until this Disney take, skews so insanely off to me, these characters are repulsive.
While Lucas never implied the Jedi were perfect, to the contrary he opened the door to show us why they weren't,
This show would've been significantly better if there was more focus on some proper dialogue/writing and some better acting to support it all.This show would've been significantly better if there was more focus on Sol and Qimir with Osha/Mae being the supporting characters instead.
Those two simply carried the show.
Ah, here was the comic (via screenrant) https://screenrant.com/star-wars-anakin-father-emperor/#:~:text=Yes, Star Wars fans, Darth,performed personally by Emperor Palpatine.
Basically what happened is that the writers wanted to make it plain that Palpatine force fathered Anakin but the story group did not approve of that reveal (prob didn't want it revealed in a comic of all places) and they wished to leave it open for the time being so fans can argue- I mean discuss their theories. The comic panels were not vague enough so the readers all took away the original intent (that Palps is Ani's daddy as per the old fan theories) and some got annoyed by that as they hated the idea so story group got annoyed as they didn't want it made canon (yet) either way and the writers had to then come out and do damage control and state that they work hard to stay in line with story group and that the vision is not solid fact (but it could be). Basically maintain status quo of "Palpy might have made Ani but he might not. Plaguis didn't do it though. Plaguis thinks maybe the force did it coz he doesn't know Palps did it- I mean he doesn't know how it spontaneously happened.I've never been more confused than by the flipflopping that set of panels has produced. The guy who did the comic himself came out and said it was a vision and manifestation of Anakin's fears and paranoia and not what literally happened. Is Lucasfilm stepping over him and putting their stamp on it as being literal now?
I don't think I agree with anything you saidMy take is George Lucas turned the Jedi Order into a bunch of morons. And Headland simply followed that blueprint.
During The Holy Trilogy, there is simply a lot that the viewer doesn't know. But during the Prequel Trilogy, the writing was bad enough and lazy enough where the Jedi were pretty dense. The idea of Anakin just magically forgetting his mother was still a slave, and then the Jedi Council simply leaving her as a slave while acknowledging her son as a danger to all of them is inexplicable.
"The West Wing Effect" was in full bloom during the Prequel Trilogy. Everyone wanted to write like Aaron Sorkin. They wanted complex geopolitical intrigue and back room machinations. Except that's incredibly difficult to write period. Lucas was not a sophisticated writer. But he attempted to show the ugly practical mechanics of the Jedi Council, the Senate and the power struggle during Palpatine's rise. Too hard to make Palpatine more clever, so he just wrote the Jedi to be morons.
IMHO this was why Baylan Skoll was such a breath of fresh air. He was a pragmatist. He knew the Jedi Order was basically on a one way suicide run long term based on their dogma and inflexibility.
Lucas made everything harder than it needed to be from a narrative standpoint. So it's not a surprise to me that Headland's Acolyte had Jedi who did the exact same thing. Where I think this deviates a bit is modern Hollywood is very anti-Christian in nature. If there's anything that enrages the average industry showrunner, most of them, it's the imagery of poor white rural Christian America as anything other than a source for vitriol. Lucas was just pushing forward bad and lazy writing. Headland had to add in barely concealed malice as well.
I'll give Headland that much credit. She didn't try to make the Jedi very clever and then magically they became the morons they ended up as in the Prequel Trilogy. She just left them as morons.
When will Star Wars stories get better? Lucas needs to die. He's an anchor around the neck of everything and so much of what can't be done is because he's effectively holding the story hostage. He needs to die so someone can finally remake the Prequel Trilogy again. ( Edit - To clarify, I am not wishing open harm upon Lucas. I love the Holy Trilogy to no end like many other long time Star Wars fans. It's just this is often like New York Yankee fans waiting for George Steinbrenner to pass away to finally get past the same self destructive pathology that crippled that franchise or like Oakland Raiders fans were waiting for Al Davis to finally expire so the team could finally be reborn again into something competitive. Everyone having to stop and constantly defer to Lucas' ego on any future storytelling is just an anchor around the potential of the franchise. If he wanted the stories his way, he shouldn't have sold it. Once he sold it, he needs to butt out, right or wrong. )
I wouldn't say they were written as inept, more flawed maybe. They are still very skilled warriors and they are shown to be smart, compassionate and most of all, good.And (from what I've read) the problem with how the Jedi are portrayed in The Acolyte, is that they are indeed portrayed as inept. But let's say that they are written as Lucas wrote them in the PT, so it's their hubris and dogma that lead them to screw up. Why would Headland have to follow that "blueprint"? You could just as well write them as knights in shining armour, and point out the contrast between the High Republic Jedi and the Jedi that were outsmarted and outmanoeuvred by the Sith, reinforcing the idea that the Jedi Order and the Republic itself was in decline because of hubris and corruption. But by all accounts Headland and her team decided to go with the idea that the Jedi Order was a failure for hundreds of years...
Enter your email address to join: